jamin@cogsci.berkeley.edu (Sugih Jamin) (10/25/89)
Since we do not have a source/binaries newsgroup or repository, would anybody mind if I post source/binaries to this newsgroup? If so, could anybody suggest where I can post my stuff? What I have so far is an adaptation of microEmacs v. 3.10. I did not port it to OS/2. But I did modify it to work with the mouse. I also made some changes so that it works more like GNU Emacs. I tried to contact the person in charge of microEmacs: Daniel Lawrence (nwd@j.cc.purdue.edu), but somehow my mail couldn't reach him. If there is no objection, I'll try to post it up here, maybe tomorrow (10/24/89). sugih
gilmore@vax1.acs.udel.EDU (Scott Gilmore) (10/25/89)
In article <32141@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> jamin@cogsci.berkeley.edu (Sugih Jamin) writes: >Since we do not have a source/binaries newsgroup or repository, >would anybody mind if I post source/binaries to this newsgroup? >If so, could anybody suggest where I can post my stuff? > >What I have so far is an adaptation of microEmacs v. 3.10. >... > >sugih How about comp.binaries.ibm.pc? The group name does not restrict it to DOS binaries, so maybe you can post OS/2 binaries there also. The only possible snag I can think of is with the moderator (Rahul Dhesi) testing the programs before he sends them out; I don't know whether he has an OS/2 system to test them on. ... scott
hdan@walt.cc.utexas.edu (Dan Higdon) (10/26/89)
Sure, please do post here (until we can get our own .binary group). I'm personally quite interested in your microEMACs port. OS/2 programmers everywhere could use a good EMACS. Now if I could just find xlisp/2... hdan@sleepy.cc.utexas.edu In reality: Dan Higdon
yozzo@arnor.UUCP (Ralph Yozzo) (10/27/89)
In article <20129@ut-emx.UUCP> hdan@walt.cc.utexas.edu (Dan Higdon) writes: >Sure, please do post here (until we can get our own .binary group). > >I'm personally quite interested in your microEMACs port. OS/2 programmers >everywhere could use a good EMACS. Now if I could just find xlisp/2... > >hdan@sleepy.cc.utexas.edu >In reality: Dan Higdon I've recompiled xscheme for OS/2. I willing to bet that xlisp will compile just fine in OS/2. There will be a couple of changes required, (but not a lot). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Ralph E. Yozzo | DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed | | IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Ctr. | herein are the Authors. | | Arpanet: yozzo@ibm.com | And are not necessarily those of his | | | employer. | | Bitnet: yozzo@yktvmx.bitnet \---------------------------------------| | Home: ..!uunet!bywater!acheron!larouch!yozzo | Phone: (914) 945-3634 work | | | Phone: (914) 564-4731 home | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ander@pawl.rpi.edu (Michael R. Primm) (10/27/89)
I've ported (in a beta-test sort of way) several programs that have
been mentioned here:
I've got GNU Bison ported to be a Family API (either OS-2 or DOS
runnable), which has been tested, and generates MS C compatable code.
I've also got GNU Flex, which is also a Family API, and which also
generates MS C compatable code.
Lastly, I've got a "just finished" port (minimal testing) of XLISP
V1.5 (with the added feature of the Berkeley Random number generator),
which should work (without graphics so far).
If anyone wants a copy of any of these, I'll send it over. If enough
people want 'em, I'll pipe them out over this forum.
--Mike Primm