[net.columbia] Chile Agrees to Provide Easter Island for Emergency Landings

alb@alice.UUCP (Adam L. Buchsbaum) (08/03/85)

The U.S. and Chile today signed an eight year pact under which
Chile will allow NASA to modify the runway on Easter Island for
use in case of an emergency shuttle landing there.  NASA will
be able to keep people there and, in an actual emergency, send
up to 450 specialists at one time.  The pact grants only the
present four shuttles landing priviledges and only as long as
they are owned and operated by NASA.

bradley@im4u.UUCP (08/04/85)

In article <4102@alice.UUCP> alb@alice.UUCP (Adam L. Buchsbaum) writes:
>The U.S. and Chile today signed an eight year pact under which
>Chile will allow NASA to modify the runway on Easter Island for
>use in case of an emergency shuttle landing there.  

A while back someone posted an article stating that the giant heads on Easter
Island would be in danger if the runway on the island was extended.  Does 
anybody know if this is still true?

-- 
David K. Bradley  

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer Science Department, The University of Texas at Austin
bradley@ut-sally.UUCP      {ihnp4,harvard,gatech,ctvax,seismo}!ut-sally!bradley
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

slerner@sesame.UUCP (Simcha-Yitzchak Lerner) (08/05/85)

> In article <4102@alice.UUCP> alb@alice.UUCP (Adam L. Buchsbaum) writes:
> >The U.S. and Chile today signed an eight year pact under which
> >Chile will allow NASA to modify the runway on Easter Island for
> >use in case of an emergency shuttle landing there.  
> 
> A while back someone posted an article stating that the giant heads on Easter
> Island would be in danger if the runway on the island was extended.  Does 
> anybody know if this is still true?
> 
> -- 
> David K. Bradley  
>

Maybe they'll strain their necks watching all the traffic come and go...

-- 
Opinions expressed are public domain, and do not belong to Lotus
Development Corp.
----------------------------------------------------------------

Simcha-Yitzchak Lerner

              {genrad|ihnp4|ima}!wjh12!talcott!sesame!slerner
                      {cbosgd|harvard}!talcott!sesame!slerner
                                slerner%sesame@harvard.ARPA 

slerner@sesame.UUCP (Simcha-Yitzchak Lerner) (08/05/85)

[]
[If this is a duplicate, sorry...postnews took a hit 1st time around.]

> In article <4102@alice.UUCP> alb@alice.UUCP (Adam L. Buchsbaum) writes:
> >The U.S. and Chile today signed an eight year pact under which
> >Chile will allow NASA to modify the runway on Easter Island for
> >use in case of an emergency shuttle landing there.  
> 
> A while back someone posted an article stating that the giant heads on Easter
> Island would be in danger if the runway on the island was extended.  Does 
> anybody know if this is still true?
> 
> -- 
> David K. Bradley  
> 

Maybe they are afraid the heads will get stiff necks watching all the
traffic come and go...


-- 
Opinions expressed are public domain, and do not belong to Lotus
Development Corp.
----------------------------------------------------------------

Simcha-Yitzchak Lerner

              {genrad|ihnp4|ima}!wjh12!talcott!sesame!slerner
                      {cbosgd|harvard}!talcott!sesame!slerner
                                slerner%sesame@harvard.ARPA 

peter@baylor.UUCP (Peter da Silva) (08/12/85)

> > In article <4102@alice.UUCP> alb@alice.UUCP (Adam L. Buchsbaum) writes:
> > >The U.S. and Chile today signed an eight year pact under which
> > >Chile will allow NASA to modify the runway on Easter Island for
> > >use in case of an emergency shuttle landing there.  

Anyone read "Shuttle Down", by G. Hank Stine?
-- 
	Peter da Silva (the mad Australian)
		UUCP: ...!shell!neuro1!{hyd-ptd,baylor,datafac}!peter
		MCI: PDASILVA; CIS: 70216,1076

stanley@bmcg.UUCP (Stanley S. Acton) (08/17/85)

> > > In article <4102@alice.UUCP> alb@alice.UUCP (Adam L. Buchsbaum) writes:
> > > >The U.S. and Chile today signed an eight year pact under which
> > > > ......
> Anyone read "Shuttle Down", by G. Hank Stine?
> -- 

That is suppose to be Shuttle Down by LEE CORREY.
-- 
..!sdcsvax!bmcg!stanley

Stanley S. Acton
Burroughs Corporation
Advanced Systems Group
(619) 485-4494

scottb@iddic.UUCP (scott bigger) (08/19/85)

In article <1807@bmcg.UUCP> stanley@bmcg.UUCP (Stanley S. Acton) writes:
>> > > In article <4102@alice.UUCP> alb@alice.UUCP (Adam L. Buchsbaum) writes:
>> > > >The U.S. and Chile today signed an eight year pact under which
>> > > > ......
>> Anyone read "Shuttle Down", by G. Hank Stine?
>> -- 
>
>That is suppose to be Shuttle Down by LEE CORREY.
>-- 
Of 'course you all knew already that Lee Correy is G. Harry Stine's pen name
(for fiction) so I won't bother you with that.  More importantly, the book is
not bad, not great, but not bad.  Have you folks thought seriously about the
implications of a shuttle being forced to land in possibly unfriendly
territory?  In Shuttle Down, Easter Island was not a contingency landing
sight, it just happened to be the only possible place to land without
ending up in the drink.  Correy (Stine) studied the political ramifications
(CIA and KGB everywhere); with good 'cause.  Both the US and the Soviet Union
are signatory to a treaty on the safe return of astronauts/cosmonauts as well
as taking care of what happens when things fall on other countries.  We got
pretty lucky with Skylab.  How many of you remember the Cosmos 901 (#?) that
fell on Canada; didn't hit anyone  but the nuclear power source is responsible
for the injury (or did they die?) of two Canadians.  USSR attitude followed
the lines of "Sorry, we don't want it back, no we won't clean it up, it's
too bad if someone got hurt, and besides that we deny that it's even ours, so
there."  A shuttle crew being forced to land in Warsaw Pact nations would
no doubt be treated as infiltrators in a thinly veiled imperialist attempt
to spy on the motherland.  The shuttle would be held as evidence.  Surprise,
surprise.  I wonder what the NASA contingency is for such an event,  I'm
not even sure what the official plan states.  Interesting problem.

Scott Bigger
tektronix!iddic!scottb

Forgive my lack of paragraphs.

mcb@styx.UUCP (Michael C. Berch) (08/20/85)

> > Anyone read "Shuttle Down", by G. Hank Stine?
...
> That is suppose to be Shuttle Down by LEE CORREY.

Lee Correy == pseudonym of G. Hank Stine.

-----
Michael C. Berch
mcb@lll-tis-b.ARPA
{akgua,allegra,cbosgd,decwrl,dual,ihnp4,sun}!idi!styx!mcb

msj@gitpyr.UUCP (Mike St. Johns) (08/21/85)

In article <1807@bmcg.UUCP> stanley@bmcg.UUCP (Stanley S. Acton) writes:
>> > > In article <4102@alice.UUCP> alb@alice.UUCP (Adam L. Buchsbaum) writes:
>> > > >The U.S. and Chile today signed an eight year pact under which
>> > > > ......
>> Anyone read "Shuttle Down", by G. Hank Stine?
>> -- 
>
>That is suppose to be Shuttle Down by LEE CORREY.

Lee Correy is the pen name (sci fic at least) of G Harry Stine who is
better known for his model rocketry.  So you are both right.

-- 
Mike St. Johns
Georgia Insitute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332
...!{akgua,allegra,amd,hplabs,ihnp4,seismo,ut-ngp}!gatech!gitpyr!msj
StJohns@MIT-Multics.ARPA  (404) 982-0035

peter@baylor.UUCP (Peter da Silva) (08/21/85)

> > > > In article <4102@alice.UUCP> alb@alice.UUCP (Adam L. Buchsbaum) writes:
> > > > >The U.S. and Chile today signed an eight year pact under which
> > > > > ......
> > Anyone read "Shuttle Down", by G. Hank Stine?
> > -- 
> 
> That is suppose to be Shuttle Down by LEE CORREY.

Lee Correy is a pen name of G. Hank Stine. I couldn't remember what his
pen name was on that book when I left the message. Sorry if it caused any
confusion.
-- 
	Peter (Made in Australia) da Silva
		UUCP: ...!shell!neuro1!{hyd-ptd,baylor,datafac}!peter
		MCI: PDASILVA; CIS: 70216,1076