fair@ucbarpa.BERKELEY.EDU (Erik E. &) (01/01/70)
Given, however, that people don't generally avail themselves of the information painstakingly maintained by Gene Spafford, et. al., it would be better to have descriptive names than `cute' names. It will be to the advantage of all concerned (less confusion, more appropriate use of the network). Erik E. Fair ucbvax!fair fair@ucbarpa.BERKELEY.EDU
slerner@sesame.UUCP (Simcha-Yitzchak Lerner) (08/21/85)
They are starting another round of net cleaning - and the following
is under consideration (original article from net.announce):
> Suggestion 6: drop "net.columbia" in favor of "net.space" (see #4)
I do not agree with this proposal. I, for one, am interested in following
the shuttle program as a distint topic, seperate from my general interest
in space. I suspect that a lot of other readers will agree with this.
--
Opinions expressed are public domain, and do not belong to Lotus
Development Corp.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Simcha-Yitzchak Lerner
{genrad|ihnp4|ima}!wjh12!talcott!sesame!slerner
{cbosgd|harvard}!talcott!sesame!slerner
slerner%sesame@harvard.ARPA
alb@alice.UUCP (Adam L. Buchsbaum) (08/23/85)
Since this has come up, I will post here the jist of what I mailed to Mark and Gene. A while ago (years), net.columbia was dropped in favor of net.space. The public outcry after this happened was such that net.columbia resumed as its own group a few months later. Several times in the past, people have suggested renaming the group (to net.shuttle, net.sts, etc.). Again, people who had been following the group mailed me letters saying they preferred the nostalgical name of net.columbia (as do I). I feel that net.columbia is one of if not the most useful, purposeful (in that I have never seen things stray off on non-related tangents) groups around. So we have need, usage, and desire shown to keep it the way it is. I, too, support keeping this group the way it is. When you have something that works, you shouldn't try to fix it. net.columbia works, so leave it alone! Adam
ggc@myriasb.UUCP (Gilles Chartrand) (08/23/85)
>> Suggestion 6: drop "net.columbia" in favor of "net.space" (see #4) > > I do not agree with this proposal. .... > ... I suspect that a lot of other readers will agree with this. I agree you completely, I don't even subscribe to net.space but I am very interested in the devellopements of the shuttle program. I hope my 2 bits helps preserve net.columbia. It's not like the newgroup was idle, there's always something in it. Gilles ...!alberta!myrias!ggc
fair@ucbvax.ARPA (Erik E. Fair) (08/25/85)
Why not net.space.shuttle? It is an apt name, which is all imporant in these days of chaos. Naming *is* important. Erik E. Fair ucbvax!fair fair@ucbarpa.BERKELEY.EDU
richardt@orstcs.UUCP (richardt) (08/26/85)
Actually, if people are after a nostalgiac name (net.columbia), why is this net.columbia instead of net.enterprise??? As far as dividing net.columbia and net.space: They definitely should remain separate -- I for one don't want to sift through net.space just to find shuttle launch dates! orstcs!richardt "This bird has flown..."
doug@escher.UUCP (Douglas J Freyburger) (08/26/85)
> > Suggestion 6: drop "net.columbia" in favor of "net.space" (see #4) > I do not agree with this proposal. .... > ... I suspect that a lot of other readers will agree with this. I don't think changing the name to "net.space" would be a good idea because it sounds too general, but I am not attached to the nostalga of the name of the first space-worthy shuttle. I'd prefer "net.shuttle". After all, there are several others besides the Columb.a. It is sort of neat to use the columbia name, but I don't think it's any big deal. -- Doug Freyburger DOUG@JPL-VLSI, DOUG@JPL-ROBOTICS, JPL 171-235 ...escher!doug, doug@aerospace, Pasadena, CA 91109 etc. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed above are far too ridiculous to be associated with my employer. Unix is a trademark of Bell Labs, VMS is a trade mark of DEC, and there are others that I'm probably forgeting to mention.
tomm@asgb.UUCP (Tom Mackey) (08/26/85)
I, too, believe that the shuttle is important enough to warrent a separate newsgroup. I do not have time to read the more general net.space....I was fortunate (and proud) to have worked on the HRSI project at LMSC, and will continue to be an avid shuttle follower. Tom Mackey ihnp4!sabre!\ hplabs!sdcrdcf!-bmcg!asgb!tomm { ihnp4, ucbvax, allegra }!sdcsvax!/ Burroughs Distributed Systems Group Boulder, Colorado
rhib@mhuxm.UUCP (irving) (08/27/85)
I'd like to see net.columbia stick around as our news category; I never read net.space. And just to cause controversy, I feel that those who spend much time feeding the newsgroup (i.e. Adam Buchsbaum et al) deserve a larger say than most of us in any renaming debate. Rich Irving mhuxm!rhib AT&T Bell Labs Murray Hill NJ p.s. democracy lives!!
dbrown@avsdT.BERKNET (Dennis Brown) (08/29/85)
> I, too, believe that the shuttle is important enough to warrent a separate > newsgroup. I do not have time to read the more general net.space....I was > fortunate (and proud) to have worked on the HRSI project at LMSC, and will > continue to be an avid shuttle follower. > > > Tom Mackey ihnp4!sabre!\ > hplabs!sdcrdcf!-bmcg!asgb!tomm > { ihnp4, ucbvax, allegra }!sdcsvax!/ > Burroughs Distributed Systems Group Boulder, Colorado I wish to keep in touch with this important project and don't want to or have time to mill through all the other items in net.space, please leave well enough alone!!!!!!!!
friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen) (08/29/85)
In article <416@mhuxm.UUCP> rhib@mhuxm.UUCP (irving) writes: >I'd like to see net.columbia stick around as our news category; I never >read net.space. And just to cause controversy, I feel that those who >spend much time feeding the newsgroup (i.e. Adam Buchsbaum et al) deserve >a larger say than most of us in any renaming debate. > It seems that my interpretation of this suggestion was a lot different than many people's. I do *not* think he was suggesting *merging* net.culumbia with the *current* net.space. He seemed to be suggesting *renaming* the group as net.space *after* moveing the current net.space to net.sci.space, thus keeping them seperate. Most of the no votes I have seen have seemed to assume he was suggesting a merger of the groups. -- Sarima (Stanley Friesen) UUCP: {ttidca|ihnp4|sdcrdcf|quad1|nrcvax|bellcore|logico}!psivax!friesen ARPA: ttidca!psivax!friesen@rand-unix.arpa
jww@sdcsvax.UUCP (Joel West) (08/29/85)
> I'd like to see net.columbia stick around as our news category; I never > read net.space. net.space.shuttle makes the most sense of all ideas I've seen on this.
eugene@ames.UUCP (Eugene Miya) (08/30/85)
> separate -- I for one don't want to sift through net.space just to find > shuttle launch dates! > orstcs!richardt Gee?! Sorry, I was posting them to net.space. I realize this was covered before, but I think it makes more sense to creat a structure like net.space with net.space.shuttle as a subgroup. Don't get so emotionally attached to things like that. Where's the soft in software? --eugene miya NASA Ames Research Center {hplabs,ihnp4,dual,hao,decwrl,allegra}!ames!aurora!eugene emiya@ames-vmsb "Spock, I'm sick and tired of your half breed interference."
meier@srcsip.UUCP (Christopher M. Meier) (08/31/85)
>They are starting another round of net cleaning - and the following >is under consideration (original article from net.announce): > >> Suggestion 6: drop "net.columbia" in favor of "net.space" (see #4) > >I do not agree with this proposal. I, for one, am interested in following >the shuttle program as a distint topic, seperate from my general interest >in space. I suspect that a lot of other readers will agree with this. >---------------------------------------------------------------- >Simcha-Yitzchak Lerner I am curious, why net.columbia instead of net.shuttle? I also do not agree with the proposal, for the same reasons as stated above. Christopher Meier Honeywell S&RC/SIP/AI ihnp4!umn-cs!srcsip!meier
ggc@myriasb.UUCP (Gilles Chartrand) (09/02/85)
> ... I do *not* think he was suggesting > *merging* net.culumbia with the *current* net.space. He seemed to be > suggesting *renaming* the group as net.space *after* moveing the > current net.space to net.sci.space, thus keeping them seperate... That's what the article said... Anyways, if we get confused with the naming think of all the poor net users who, looking through the group names, come across "net.space". They would say: 'Humm... a general space group, I sould join and talk about my new "hunky-dory-high-power-remote- controlled-telescope'". If you want to rename the group to net.shuttle, or net.sci.shuttle, that's fine with me because THAT reflects the contents of the news group. Gilles ...!alberta!myrias!ggc
irwin@uiucdcs.Uiuc.ARPA (09/06/85)
I vote for net.shuttle, or leave it as it is! The shuttle program will be around for quite a while, we will continue to want to hear about it, with out wading through a lot of other space info.
fair@ucbvax.ARPA (Erik E. Fair) (09/08/85)
I repeat, what's wrong with net.space.shuttle? It is an appropriate name, and it is a separate group, so you don't have to wade through net.space to read net.space.shuttle. Erik E. Fair ucbvax!fair fair@ucbarpa.BERKELEY.EDU
irwin@uiucdcs.Uiuc.ARPA (09/12/85)
What's wrong with net.space.shuttle?? It is not strictly a spacecraft. It is also an aircraft. You could also tie it on the tail of the aviation notes system as net.aviation.shuttle, and it would be just as correct, as net.space.shuttle. Since it is <BOTH>, and not unique to either of the two, it deserves a specific catagory.
pavo@loral.UUCP (Repo Man) (09/13/85)
In article <10307@ucbvax.ARPA> fair@ucbvax.ARPA (Erik E. Fair) writes: >I repeat, what's wrong with net.space.shuttle? It is an appropriate >name, and it is a separate group, so you don't have to wade through >net.space to read net.space.shuttle. > > Erik E. Fair ucbvax!fair fair@ucbarpa.BERKELEY.EDU I say, 'net.columbia' has been adequate for years now and it works just fine so what's all this debate about anyway? Let's get on with shuttle- related discussions, ok?
chip@vaxwaller.UUCP (Chip Kozy) (09/17/85)
*** REPLACE THIS WITH YOUR *** Whatever happens in this re-naming thing, PLEASE leave the shuttle in a SEPERATE group. Whether it be net.columbia, net.space.shuttle, or whatever, don't merge it with any other group. This is an important enough subject to warrant its' own newsgroup. (BTW I favor *.columbia over *.shuttle.) Happiness; Chip -- Chip Kozy (415) 939-2400 x-2048 Varian Inst. Grp. 2700 Mitchell Dr. Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598 {zehntel,amd,fortune,resonex,rtech}!varian!chip
arnold@ucsfcgl.UUCP (Ken Arnold%CGL) (09/18/85)
In article <916@loral.UUCP> pavo@loral.UUCP (Repo Man) writes: >In article <10307@ucbvax.ARPA> fair@ucbvax.ARPA (Erik E. Fair) writes: >>I repeat, what's wrong with net.space.shuttle? It is an appropriate >>name, and it is a separate group, so you don't have to wade through >>net.space to read net.space.shuttle. >> >> Erik E. Fair ucbvax!fair fair@ucbarpa.BERKELEY.EDU > >I say, 'net.columbia' has been adequate for years now and it works just >fine so what's all this debate about anyway? Let's get on with shuttle- >related discussions, ok? net.columbia is a fine name. I, for one, have always wanted to talk about the Columbia river, but was unaware there was a group for it. Or maybe the group is for discussion of Columbia University? I wouldn't want to post to the wrong newsgroup... However, when I want to talk about the space shuttle, I go looking for a group, but find ... nothing? net.space.shuttle would be an obvious name. So what's wrong with it? The Columbia is only one of a fleet of shuttles, so it is not very appropriate, and it is certainly not very descriptive. Can you imagine net.rec.model-t being the discussion group about cars in general? It doesn't make much sense. Would the discussion about the refurbishility (what an icky word) of the Enterprise go in net.columbia? It would certainly go in net.space.shuttle. Ken Arnold Roll on, Columbia, roll on! Roll on, Columbia, roll on! Your power is turning the darkness to dawn, So roll on, Columbia, roll on! -- Woody Guthrie
usenet@ucbvax.ARPA (USENET News Administration) (10/13/85)
In article <641@ucsfcgl.UUCP> arnold@ucsfcgl.UUCP (Ken Arnold) writes: >In article <916@loral.UUCP> pavo@loral.UUCP (Repo Man) writes: >> [Quotes from the "net.columbia" name debate.] > >net.columbia is a fine name. I, for one, have always wanted to talk >about the Columbia river, but was unaware there was a group for it. Or >maybe the group is for discussion of Columbia University? I wouldn't >want to post to the wrong newsgroup... > >[...] The Columbia is only one of a fleet of shuttles, so it is not very >appropriate, and it is certainly not very descriptive. >[...] > Would the >discussion about the refurbishility (what an icky word) of the >Enterprise go in net.columbia? It would certainly go in >net.space.shuttle. > > Ken Arnold No joke people: Until about 1 hour ago, I was under the impression that net.columbia was a Columbia Univ. bboard. I just so happened to haphazardly come across a random reference to this board elsewhere... *Please* rename it to something more descriptive. -Adam J. Richter
stoner@qumix.UUCP (Dave Stone) (10/14/85)
> > No joke people: Until about 1 hour ago, I was under the impression > that net.columbia was a Columbia Univ. bboard. I just so happened > to haphazardly come across a random reference to this board > elsewhere... *Please* rename it to something more descriptive. > > -Adam J. Richter And if everybody would read net.announce.newusers once in a while they would find a nice updated newsgroup listing once every month. I read over the whole list prior to reading any news and found just what I wanted to subscibe to including net.columbia=shuttle stuff. I fact when you finish reading this go check it out . There is a lot of good information there. I'm not picking on you Adam I think people would find a lot of "geez I didn't know that" type things if they would take time to read some of these listings that people take a lot of time to put together. I subcsribe to newusers so I can keep up to date on these things. +----------------+ / /| +----------------+ | | stoner@qumix | | | David A. Stone | | | Qume Corp. | + | San Jose, CA. |/ +----------------+