[comp.sys.mac.hardware] Farallon vs. Nuvotech Star Control

ddunlap@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu (02/27/90)

Hello Netland,

I am in the process of installing a building-wide AppleTalk network.  I have
decided that a star controller is the way to go.  I had originally been
planning on using the controller from Farallon, but have discovered that
Nuvotech has a 16 port controller for only a slightly higher price than
Farallon's 12 port box.

So, what I want to know is, does anyone out there have experience with both
controllers that can give a comparison?  If not, do you have anything good
or bad to say about either of the controllers?  Is there another controller
I should be looking at?

Any and all info. would be appreciated.  I have not seen any discussion of this
topic on the net so it may be to the advantage of others to post.  Or if you
prefer E-mail will work just as well for me.

Thanks in advance.

Dave Dunlap
Manager of Systems Services
Krannert Center for the Performing Arts
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
ddunlap@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu

mdc@spt.entity.com (Marty Connor) (02/28/90)

In article <88500008@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu> ddunlap@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu writes:

>Hello Netland,

Hi hi.

>I am in the process of installing a building-wide AppleTalk network.  I have
>decided that a star controller is the way to go.  I had originally been
>planning on using the controller from Farallon, but have discovered that
>Nuvotech has a 16 port controller for only a slightly higher price than
>Farallon's 12 port box.
>So, what I want to know is, does anyone out there have experience with both
>controllers that can give a comparison?  If not, do you have anything good
>or bad to say about either of the controllers?  Is there another controller
>I should be looking at?

I have used both boxes.

My SO is waiting so this'll have to be quick.

Both boxes seem to work well.  The Farallon StarController has 12 ports, and
basically lets you connect up to 12 branches with lots of machines on
each branch to each other.  Gives a potential net of up to 36,000 feet
of cable.  The fox itself is about 9" sqaure, and has an external 12V
transformer.   You have to buy a phoneblock or adapter for hooking to
the outside world.   You can get it at a VERY competitive price from
MacConnection.  They also sell the phone block and cable.  There is
manager software for the box but only from one Mac, and it requires
you to connect that Mac to the StarController with a special cable.
No biggie, but read on...

The NuvoTech TurboStar is a sexier and more expensive box.  It is a
little larger (about 12" square), but mounts easily.  It also needs a
wiring kit.  (The one for the StarController works fine, though
(smile), and can be had for $64 from MacConnection overnight (smile)).

The nice things about the TUrboSTar are that it has LEDs on the box
telling you what branches are active, and it comes with software that
lets anyone (who knows the password and has the DA) to check out the
TurboStar and see what's happening (load, port activity, name ports).
You can even turn on and off ports (though I wouldn't recommend
turning off your own...).   The box seems solid enough, though, and I
can recommend it (assuming the first ammendment is worth ANYTHING
these days).  Also the LEDs tell you if a port is jamming, and turn it
off until it is fixed.  Nice touch, though I haven't had a problem
with this.

In anycase, if you have the extra few hundred dollars, spring for the
TurboStar.   If you just need more length, and need a brick that works
fine, and don't add users a lot, get the StarController.  Need
supplies, try MacConnection.  Now who's your pal, who's your buddy?

>Dave Dunlap
>Manager of Systems Services
>Krannert Center for the Performing Arts
>University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
>ddunlap@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu

I'm sorry, Dave, I can't do that...
(just kidding, but always wanted to use that line...)

Marty

-- 
Marty Connor, Marty's Computer Workshop,  "Specializing in Macintosh Training"
126 Inman Street, Cambridge, MA 02139; (617) 491-6935
mdc@entity.com, or ...{harvard|uunet}!mit-eddie!spt!mdc

evelyn@uts.amdahl.com (Evelyn Mast) (02/28/90)

In article <88500008@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu> ddunlap@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu writes:
>
>Hello Netland,
>
>I am in the process of installing a building-wide AppleTalk network.  I have
>decided that a star controller is the way to go.  I had originally been
>planning on using the controller from Farallon, but have discovered that
>Nuvotech has a 16 port controller for only a slightly higher price than
>Farallon's 12 port box.
>
>So, what I want to know is, does anyone out there have experience with both
>controllers that can give a comparison?  If not, do you have anything good
>or bad to say about either of the controllers?  Is there another controller
>I should be looking at?
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>Dave Dunlap
>Manager of Systems Services
>Krannert Center for the Performing Arts
>University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
>ddunlap@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu

We currently have the Farallon StarController, and when I expand our
network I will get a Nuvotech TurboStar.  The Farallon is a fine box,
but the reasons I will go for the TurboStar are:
1) 4 more ports on the TurboStar
2) the star management software for the TurboStar is much better than
   for the StarController.  For one thing, to set up a Mac to manage
   the Farallon you have to use a special "management connection" on
   the side of the box.  And there are distance limitations and special
   wiring considerations for this management connection.  The Nuvotech
   has software which will allow one to manage the ports from anywhere
   on the network (I believe), anyway you don't have to use any special
   connections.

Evelyn Mast
amdahl!key!evelyn
 

roy@phri.nyu.edu (Roy Smith) (02/28/90)

In article <314@spt.entity.com> mdc@spt.UUCP (Marty Connor) writes:
> The Farallon StarController has 12 ports, and basically lets you connect
> up to 12 branches with lots of machines on each branch to each other.
> Gives a potential net of up to 36,000 feet of cable.

	We have the Farallon SC box and are happy with it.  A few comments,
though.  I think you only get 3000 feet per port if you are using #22 wire.
The more common #24 only allows you 2000 feet per port, which can be 1 2000
foot branch, or 2 x 1000, 3 x 670, or 4 x 500.  I suspect the Nuvotech box
has the same limits.  You can interconnect SCs in various ways to get even
bigger nets (either direct connectons, or via AppleTalk/Ethernet bridges,
like a Kbox).  Again, the same is probably true of the Nuvobox.

	As for the control connection being direct on the Farallon and
over the net on the Nuvo, I'm not sure which is better.  Granted, network
access is more convenient, but I could imagine a situation where the net is
so completely hosed that with the Nuvobox, you couldn't even talk to the
box to run diagnostics.

	Now, a question.  When I run new PhoneNet runs, I start by plugging
a standard tone generator into the modular jack where I want to end up, and
trace the line back through the various levels of punchdown blocks in
wiring closets until I get back to the central panel where our SC is.
Then, I go back to the jack and unplug the tone generator before going back
to the SC and making the last punchdown connection to the SC's distribution
block.  My question is whether that extra trip to another floor to unplug
the tone generator is really necessary.  My best guess is that the audio
frequency tone won't get through the high frequency transformers that
PhoneNet uses and I shouldn't worry about it, but I'm not sure enough to
risk it.  Anybody know?
--
Roy Smith, Public Health Research Institute
455 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016
roy@alanine.phri.nyu.edu -OR- {att,philabs,cmcl2,rutgers,hombre}!phri!roy
"My karma ran over my dogma"

ajq@mace.cc.purdue.edu (John O'Malley) (03/03/90)

In article <88500008@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu> ddunlap@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu writes:
>I had originally been planning on using the controller from Farallon, but 
>have discovered that Nuvotech has a 16 port controller for only a slightly 
>higher price than Farallon's 12 port box.
>
>... does anyone out there have experience with both
>controllers that can give a comparison?

Check out the 13 February issue of MacWEEK, page 52.  It has a review
of the Nuvotech box that compares it with the Farallon StarController.

-John
---
John O'Malley           / Macintosh  / Purdue University / (317)
ajq@mace.cc.purdue.edu / Specialist / Computing Center  / 494-1787

ajq@mace.cc.purdue.edu (John O'Malley) (03/03/90)

In article <314@spt.entity.com> mdc@spt.UUCP (Marty Connor) writes:
>The Farallon StarController has 12 ports, and basically lets you connect
>up to 12 branches with lots of machines on each branch to each other.

Actually, the Farallon StarController has 12 ports, and each port can have
4 branches.  So, if you limited your network to one device per branch, one
StarController could handle 48 devices.  (We have a Macintosh SE lab with
42 computers and three LaserWriters hooked up in this manner.)

Here's what the StarController manual says about cable length (page 36):

	# branches on a port		Max cable length per branch
		1				3000 feet
		2				1500 feet
		3				1000 feet
		4				 750 feet

Theoretically, each of those 48 branches could have 32 devices on it,
which is the AppleTalk limit, right?  Assuming that the branch didn't
exceed 750 feet in length.

Our "main" AppleTalk network (the one our staff uses), by the way,
has a Farallon StarController.  Branch 1 on each of Ports 1 thru 8 is
in use.  Some branches have 2 or 3 devices on them.  We've had no
problems.

-John
---
John O'Malley           / Macintosh  / Purdue University / (317)
ajq@mace.cc.purdue.edu / Specialist / Computing Center  / 494-1787