[comp.sys.mac.hardware] Hard Disk "interleave"

macman@wpi.wpi.edu (Chris Silverberg) (07/01/90)

Hi!

Can someone help explain to me the "interleave" characteristic of hard drives?
I have a new Quantum HD, and when formatting, it asks me for the desired
interleave. (1, 2, 3, or 4). Currently I have the HD installed internally
on my MacSE. (no accelerations or anything).

Specifically, what interleave SHOULD I be using, and what advantages/
disadvantages/side effects are of using the right and wrong selection?

Thanks much!

- Chris 
 ._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.
   Chris Silverberg                     AOL:   Silverberg
   Worcester Polytechnic Institute      GEnie: C.Silverberg
   INTERNET: macman@wpi.wpi.edu         SYSOP: Main Street U.S.A. BBS
   FIDONET:  322/575.1                         508.832.7725  (1200/2400)

cckweiss@castor (07/03/90)

In article <13801@wpi.wpi.edu> macman@wpi.wpi.edu (Chris Silverberg) writes:
>Hi!
>
>Can someone help explain to me the "interleave" characteristic of hard drives?
>I have a new Quantum HD, and when formatting, it asks me for the desired
>interleave. (1, 2, 3, or 4). Currently I have the HD installed internally
>on my MacSE. (no accelerations or anything).
>
>Specifically, what interleave SHOULD I be using, and what advantages/
>disadvantages/side effects are of using the right and wrong selection?
>
>Thanks much!
>
>- Chris 
> ._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.
>   Chris Silverberg                     AOL:   Silverberg
>   Worcester Polytechnic Institute      GEnie: C.Silverberg
>   INTERNET: macman@wpi.wpi.edu         SYSOP: Main Street U.S.A. BBS
>   FIDONET:  322/575.1                         508.832.7725  (1200/2400)

Interleave refers to the number of physical disc sectors skipped between
each logical sector. The interleave is created to allow slower 
processors to digest one sector worth of data before the next one
comes along. If interleave is too large things slow down a little,as
the processor is waiting for the next logical sector to come into
position under the r/w head. If interleave is too small then things
slow down a lot, as the next logical sector will be past the r/w head
before the processor is ready to accept the data. When this happens
the system must wait a full disk rotation for the correct physical
sector to come around again.

On an SE most manufacturers seem to recommend a 3:1 interleave, but
hey, what to they (or I) know...

Ken Weiss

ts@cup.portal.com (Tim W Smith) (07/06/90)

Assuming your Quantum drive is in the Quantum ProDrive series,
then you don't care what the interleave is set to.  The interleave
parameter is ignored by the drive, since the firmware on the
drive feels that it knows more about the drive than you do.

					Tim Smith