ghh@clarity.Princeton.EDU (Gilbert Harman) (07/12/90)
Has anyone tried the new Ehman 15 inch portrait monitor?
According to the July 10th MacWeek, it sells for $499
including a video card for the Mac II, SE or SE/30, which is
much cheaper than the Apple portrait monitor.
--
Gilbert Harman
Princeton University Cognitive Science Laboratory
221 Nassau Street, Princeton, NJ 08542
ghh@clarity.princeton.edu
HARMAN@PUCC.BITNETghh@clarity.Princeton.EDU (Gilbert Harman) (07/16/90)
In article <GHH.90Jul11145215@clarity.princeton.edu> I wrote: >Has anyone tried the new Ehman 15 inch portrait monitor? >According to the July 10th MacWeek, it sells for $499 >including a video card for the Mac II, SE or SE/30, which is >much cheaper than the Apple portrait monitor. No one has responded who has used this monitor. So, I guess prudence dictates sticking with the Apple portrait monitor... -- Gilbert Harman Princeton University Cognitive Science Laboratory 221 Nassau Street, Princeton, NJ 08542 ghh@clarity.princeton.edu HARMAN@PUCC.BITNET
Leo.Bores@f14.n114.z1.fidonet.org (Leo Bores) (07/21/90)
In an article of <16 Jul 90 16:01:18 GMT>, ghh@clarity.Princeton.EDU (Gilbert
Harman) writes:
GH>>Has anyone tried the new Ehman 15 inch portrait monitor?
GH>>According to the July 10th MacWeek, it sells for $499
GH>>including a video card for the Mac II, SE or SE/30, which is
GH>>much cheaper than the Apple portrait monitor.
GH>
GH>No one has responded who has used this monitor. So, I guess
GH>prudence dictates sticking with the Apple portrait
GH>monitor...
GH>
Probably because it makes more sense to spend a few more dollars for the
two-pwger - which has gotten rave reviews.
Leo Bores, M.D.
--
Uucp: ...{gatech,ames,rutgers}!ncar!asuvax!stjhmc!14!Leo.Bores
Internet: Leo.Bores@f14.n114.z1.fidonet.org