[comp.sys.mac.hardware] Experience with Quickdraw printers

bergman@ceres.m2c.org (08/24/90)

I am planning on purchasing a Mac IIfx soon, and am thinking of getting 
a laser printer with it.  The two paths I am promarily considering are
either getting the BLP II postscript printer from GCC, or getting one
of the several QuickDraw printers available, and a software version of 
PostScript to run in the background.  Has anyone out there got experience
with the latter configuration?

Issues that have come up are these:

  what options are there for software?  Freedom of Press, for example, 
  works best with HP printers, not quickdraw printers.

  I do plan to produce mostly straight text, but would like occasional
  access to PostScript.  

  I expect that the high speed of the fx would allow it to do printer
  spooling and processing in the background without significantly affecting
  the speed of "normal" tasks such as using a word processor.  Anyone
  have experience with this?

  I've heard good things about the PLP from GCC, and the BLP looks nice 
  as well.  Any bad points?

Thanks,

--mike bergman


--mike bergman
      Massachusetts Microelectronics Center
      75 North Drive, Westborough, MA  01581, USA +1 (508) 870-0312 x262
      UUCP: (...harvard)!m2c!bergman    INTERNET:   bergman@m2c.org         

mccabe@proline.cs.unc.edu (Daniel McCabe) (08/25/90)

In article <5881@m2c.M2C.ORG> bergman@ceres.m2c.org () writes:
>
>  I expect that the high speed of the fx would allow it to do printer
>  spooling and processing in the background without significantly affecting
>  the speed of "normal" tasks such as using a word processor.  Anyone
>  have experience with this?
>

I run a (classic) PLP from an accelerated Mac II.  The PLP requires full CPU
attention when sending the image to the printer, so you don't have background
printing ability with the PLP.  However, even with a stock Mac II, image
generation time is respectable (compare the 16 MHz 68020 in the Mac II
with the 12 MHz 68000 in a LaserWriter; this argument holds modulo Postscript).

>  I've heard good things about the PLP from GCC, and the BLP looks nice 
>  as well.  Any bad points?

One of the biggest complaints that most people have with the PLP is that toner
loading can result in a big mess (because the toner cartridge is not a sealed
system, unlike Canon toner cartidges).  However, if you are reasonably 
careful, you should have no problems. I haven't made a mess yet.  This is
an issue for both the PLP and BLP, since they both use a Ricoh engine, but 
not the new PLP II (I think).

I also had problems with streaking on the page.  GCC sent me a new gizmo
(OPC?, cleaning assembly?) for free, which fixed the problem.  BTW, this
was AFTER the warranty expired.

Cheers,
danm

Disclaimer: I have no affiliation with GCC other than as a satisfied 
customer.