[comp.sys.mac.hardware] Good monitors for all-day document processing?

bin@primate.wisc.edu (Brain in Neutral) (09/12/90)

What are good monitors for extended use, by which I mean:  all-day
exposure.  I have in mind a secretary sitting in front of a Macintosh
all day, day after day.  It's not really quite so bad as that, but I'd
like to know which monitors are suitable for looking at *a lot every day*
without inducing a lot of eyestrain.

Black and white is fine, but flicker, screen shimmering and loss of contrast
with heavy use are not.

I'm interested in knowing both about units that qualify for these
conditions, and those that do *not*.  Thanks.

Paul DuBois
dubois@primate.wisc.edu

-- 

Was all of this because I wore a big man's hat?

siegel@endor.uucp (Rich Siegel) (09/12/90)

In article <3080@uakari.primate.wisc.edu> bin@primate.wisc.edu (Brain in Neutral) writes:
>What are good monitors for extended use, by which I mean:  all-day
>exposure.  I have in mind a secretary sitting in front of a Macintosh
>all day, day after day.  It's not really quite so bad as that, but I'd
>like to know which monitors are suitable for looking at *a lot every day*
>without inducing a lot of eyestrain.

	I've been using a Radius Pivot display being driven in a Radius
FPD-II card. It's a black&white single-page display. I love it. The
Pivot screen is the *nicest* single-page display I have ever seen, the 
corners aren't twisted, the focus is good, and the display is uniform.
I highly recommend it. I use mine about ten to twelve hours a day
for mainly text editing.

	The old Radius FPD displays aren't as good; I'd recommend the
Pivot, though.

R.

 Rich Siegel	Software Engineer	Symantec Languages Group
 Internet: siegel@endor.harvard.edu	UUCP: ..harvard!endor!siegel

I hate fascist Pnews implementations which limit the .signature to 4 lines.

ahlenius@motcid.UUCP (Mark Ahlenius) (09/12/90)

We installed a Radius two page monochrome monitor on our SE
at our church.  The display is excellent, its sharp the the
focus seems uniform throughout the screen.  On the plain SE
the video card that installs inside the Mac plugs into a
Magic-bus adaptor card which plugs into the expansion slot.
The installation is not the cleanest design I have ever seen
but it works.  I'd recommend this display, for all day use
and especially for DTP.
-- 
===============	regards   'mark  =============================================
Mark Ahlenius 		  voice:(708)-632-5346  email: uunet!motcid!ahleniusm
Motorola Inc.		  fax:  (708)-632-2413
Arlington, Hts. IL, USA	 60004

baumgart@esquire.dpw.com (Steve Baumgarten) (09/12/90)

I'm in love with my Apple Two Page Display, which just beats the pants
off the 19" Sun monitor I have on my desk at work.  The screen appears
flat, focus is excellent, even in the corners.  Best of all, it works
in gray scale, so it's suitable for work other than just word
processing.

I'm using the Apple 8.24 card to drive it; I'm not sure if other cards
work with it or not.

We have an Apple Color monitor at work, and I think it's good enough
to work with every day, even if you just wanted to do word
processing/spreadsheets/etc.  But I prefer having the extra real
estate, and being to look at two whole pages at once for layout work.
As others in this group have mentioned, I have yet to see a better
looking color monitor.

Like those Nike commercials:  Apple Knows Monitors...  ;-)

--
   Steve Baumgarten             | "New York... when civilization falls apart,
   Davis Polk & Wardwell        |  remember, we were way ahead of you."
   baumgart@esquire.dpw.com     | 
   cmcl2!esquire!baumgart       |                           - David Letterman

lemke@radius.com (Steve Lemke) (09/13/90)

bin@primate.wisc.edu (Brain in Neutral) writes:

}What are good monitors for extended use, by which I mean:  all-day
}exposure.  I have in mind a secretary sitting in front of a Macintosh
}all day, day after day.  It's not really quite so bad as that, but I'd
}like to know which monitors are suitable for looking at *a lot every day*
}without inducing a lot of eyestrain.
}
}Black and white is fine, but flicker, screen shimmering and loss of contrast
}with heavy use are not.
}
}I'm interested in knowing both about units that qualify for these
}conditions, and those that do *not*.  Thanks.

Disclaimer:  I work for Radius.  However, I'm sure you can find lots of
other people who _don't_ but would agree none-the-less...

Check out the Radius Pivot Display and the Radius Two Page Display.
Earlier this year, MacWorld had an issue evaluating black and white as
well as gray scale displays, and they gave top honors to the Radius Full
Page Display (in the full page display category), the Radius Two Page
Display (in the two page display category), and the Radius Gray Scale Two
Page Display (same display as the TPD, but different (8-bit) board).  All
three beat out Apple's entries in the same categories.  (The FPD has since
been replace by the Pivot Display, which is the only full page display
to work in landscape as well as portrait mode).

If you want color, check out the Apple Color Display (there's none better
in a 13" display).

Of course, one thing I definitely recommend is going to a dealer who HAS
the models you're interested in comparing, and SEE for yourself!  (Or
better yet, let the person who will be using it look at it...)

}Paul DuBois
}dubois@primate.wisc.edu

--Steve (who stares at a lovely Radius TPD most of the day).
-- 
----- Steve Lemke, Engineering Quality Assurance, Radius Inc., San Jose -----
----- Reply to: lemke@radius.com     (Note: NEW domain-style address!!) -----

daley@cs.nps.navy.mil (John Daley) (09/13/90)

1. All this talk about Apple having the *best* color monitor
is getting nauseating. I have a Sony 1302, which cost over
$100. less than the Apple, came with a tilt/swivel (which
Apple will happily charge you extra for), and is (I'm told)
a more recently updated Trinitron than Apple uses.

2. For all-day secretarial-type use, however, I agree with
the comments regarding a FPD (full-page display) as an ex-
cellent choice. Mirror's appear to be excellent values.


jd

     {the author, that's me, bears full responsibility for this
message; any one else is clearly irresponsible!}
_________________________________________________________________________
daley@cs.nps.navy.mil | "Most DOS-ified people are so confused, they
Macintosh Evangelist  |  don't know whether to scratch their watch
		      |  or wind their ass."
--------------------- |              --w/apologies to "Steel Magnolias" 
"Congress: It's the   |      
opposite of progress."|  Any other disclaimer you can think of probably 
      --Gallagher     |                applies *here*.   -- JD
                      |
_________________________________________________________________________

fiddler@concertina.Eng.Sun.COM (Steve Hix) (09/13/90)

In article <1399@cs.nps.navy.mil>, daley@cs.nps.navy.mil (John Daley) writes:
> 1. All this talk about Apple having the *best* color monitor
> is getting nauseating. I have a Sony 1302, which cost over
> $100. less than the Apple, came with a tilt/swivel (which
> Apple will happily charge you extra for), and is (I'm told)
> a more recently updated Trinitron than Apple uses.

There's more to a monitor than the tube.

Otherwise, why the visible differences between various brands
using the same tube for their offerings?

Not that I've got any stock in Apple, I'd just as soon buy something
that worked as well or better for less money.

--
------------
  The only drawback with morning is that it comes 
    at such an inconvenient time of day.
------------