[comp.sys.mac.hardware] Noise from Quantum 105 Hard Disks

18215MES@MSU.BITNET (10/26/90)

I have the same problem, and have been too lazy to do anything
about it. I got mine from MacTel. (anyone had problems with them?)

Someone also posted on this subject a while back and
indicated that this IS NOT the stiction related problem,
but may indicate a BAD BEARING which can cause the disk to freeze up!

Mine seems to work ok most of the time, but that noise is irritating,
and does slow down the performance of the drive by 100%. I don't
look forward to being without a hard disk for a week to a month...

chma@iceman.jcu.oz (Michael Antolovich) (10/28/90)

In article <69318215MES@MSU> 18215MES@MSU.BITNET writes:
>I have the same problem, and have been too lazy to do anything
>about it. I got mine from MacTel. (anyone had problems with them?)
>
>Someone also posted on this subject a while back and
>indicated that this IS NOT the stiction related problem,
>but may indicate a BAD BEARING which can cause the disk to freeze up!
>
>Mine seems to work ok most of the time, but that noise is irritating,
>and does slow down the performance of the drive by 100%. I don't
>look forward to being without a hard disk for a week to a month...

   I have been just as lazy (it was someone else, who has a good drive, that
pointed out how slow the drive is).  What do I have to look forward too ?
                                                        Michael.
PS It was a 3rd Party 105M Quantum formatted with SilverLining.

        {This added section is needed to overcome this stupid
        machines idea of reducing the size of this reply !!!}
        {This added section is needed to overcome this stupid
        machines idea of reducing the size of this reply !!!}
        {This added section is needed to overcome this stupid
        machines idea of reducing the size of this reply !!!}
        {This added section is needed to overcome this stupid
        machines idea of reducing the size of this reply !!!}
        {This added section is needed to overcome this stupid
        machines idea of reducing the size of this reply !!!}