[net.followup] What's in a 3b2?

ctk@ecsvax.UUCP (06/07/84)

This morning I attended a sales presentation given by ATT at TUCC*. The
object was to sell us all 3b2's. The machine (at least the $10,000 model)
comes with .5M of ram, a 10M hard disk, and a 720k floppy. The operating
system is a subset of System V UNIX (trademarks ... etc.). A simple
floating point benchmark was run on the machine and it looks considerably
slower on floats than an IBM PC with an 8087, a Sage II, and many other
boxes that sell for half the price or less. Languages cost about $300-$400
extra. No programming language at all comes with the machine.
	I asked if hardware floating point support was available and was
told that it was not (even for the larger 3b5) but they were thinking
about it. For floating point work it looks like we're all better off with
8087 equipped IBM PC's .
	I asked one of the ATT people if he could tell me a little about
the architecture of the 32000 processor. He said that he couldn't tell
me anything about the architecture, instruction set, etc. as a matter
of ATT policy. He also said that he had not been told that this would
ever change. It seems to me that this is insane. Who (certainly not me)
would ever buy a computer whose innards were top secret? Maybe they're
trying to sell these things as dedicated word processors. As to the 3b5
and larger machines, will anyone buy a $100K+ mini with top secret
architecture? I was pretty disappointed in the 3b2 but was even more
disappointed in this policy of secrecy. Is this why no details of the
WE32000 processors appear in net.arch?

		* TUCC is a local computer center.




    C.T. Kelley
    Dept. of Math.
    N.C. State U.
    Raleigh, N.C. 27650
    decvax!mcnc!ecsvax!ctk

emigh@ecsvax.UUCP (06/07/84)

<>

  I also attend the mentioned demonstration of the 3B2-300 computer.  In
addition to Kelley's comments, I have the following impressions:

1)	AT&T has a long way to go in learning how to market computers.  In a
	presentation to ~30 technical people, there were NO technical people
	on AT&T's team.  They apparently came to the meeting expecting to talk
	to vice-president types.

2)	Even with a full complement of utilities software, many utilities that
	we come to expect were missing.  For example, as far as we could tell,
	there was no pagination utility (e.g., more, page).  Of course, none
	of the AT&T staff really knew what utilities were included, and manuals
	were not available (man and the man pages also are not there).

3)	To an audience that was largely academic, they showed a lack of
	understanding of how universities operate.  They have not decided on
	an academic discount, so the told us that if we bought one at full
	price they would rewrite the contract after the decision was made and
	give us a rebate!!!  Try getting that past your Vice President for
	Business.

I was not as disappointed with the 3B2 as Kelley--after all it was announced
only 6 weeks ago.  I expect many of the deficiencies to disappear in the near
future.
--
Ted H. Emigh     Genetics and Statistics, North Carolina State U, Raleigh  NC
USENET:	{akgua decvax duke ihnp4 unc}!mcnc!ecsvax!emigh
ARPA:	decvax!mcnc!ecsvax!emigh@BERKELEY

guy@rlgvax.UUCP (Guy Harris) (06/09/84)

Read the article "The Operating System and Language Support Features of
the BELLMAC-32", in the Proceedings of the Symposium on Architectural
Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, published as
ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News Volume 10, Number 2, March 1982
and ACM SIGPLAN Notices, Volume 17, Number 4, April 1982.  It doesn't contain
an opcode map and description, but it does give a number of details -
it's got a sort of post-PDP-11 architecture (general registers, instructions
consisting of opcode+operands, the latter being specified by "addressing
modes", etc.).  10 general purpose registers, and the PC, SP, FP, and AP
in the VAX-11 fashion.  So read the article to the AT&T person - it'll
be fun if it makes their head explode...  (Admittedly, HP is even more
closed-mouthed about their Focus chip, so AT&T isn't the only offender
here.)

One little tidbit - I've seen the disassembler code for the 3B20, and it's
one of the biggest I've ever seen.  I get the impression from it that
it's a lot of complexity in the instruction set to no great benefit -
it's slightly less space-efficient than VAX-11 code (the VAX-11 disassembler
consists of about two pages of code and a gigantic table) and the 3B20
performs at about the same level as an 11/780.  I don't know how similar
the 3B20 and the WE32000 are; I've heard that they are and I've heard that
they really aren't.

	Guy Harris
	{seismo,ihnp4,allegra}!rlgvax!guy

guy@rlgvax.UUCP (Guy Harris) (06/09/84)

> 1)	AT&T has a long way to go in learning how to market computers.  In a
> 	presentation to ~30 technical people, there were NO technical people
> 	on AT&T's team.  They apparently came to the meeting expecting to talk
> 	to vice-president types.

> 2)	Even with a full complement of utilities software, many utilities that
> 	we come to expect were missing.  For example, as far as we could tell,
> 	there was no pagination utility (e.g., more, page).  Of course, none
> 	of the AT&T staff really knew what utilities were included, and manuals
> 	were not available (man and the man pages also are not there).

> 3)	To an audience that was largely academic, they showed a lack of
> 	understanding of how universities operate.

None of this is really surprising, given where AT&T is coming from.  As
Al Capp, I believe, once said "You can change your government - but have
you ever tried to change your phone company?"  They can't rely on everybody
who wants a computer just assuming that you have to get it from the Phone
Company.  I suspect that there are a lot of habits learned in the Old Days
that have yet to be fully unlearned yet.

As for the people there not knowing about the details of their product, the
best story I heard in that regard was about somebody interested in
UNIX boxes who called up the local ATTIS office asking about the 3B.  Their
response was "What's a 3B?"  When he replied, "One of the new line of
computers you announced yesterday, and advertised in full page ads in several
newspapers," they said "Well, nobody told us about them."  I'm sure they'll
learn, but don't expect miracles overnight.

	Guy Harris
	{seismo,ihnp4,allegra}!rlgvax!guy