jsorenso@thesis1.med.uth.tmc.edu (JEFFREY MARIUS SORENSON) (06/25/91)
The lab I'm working for wants to get a Mac to run some floating-point
calculation intensive simulations (with a friendly interface of course).
What is the fastest combination available? I'm guessing that a ][fx with a
Radius Rocket is the fastest dynamic duo. Is there a faster combination?
Other concerns:
1. I read a posting here about the '040 that said FP operations on the '040
require a 256K block of code to translate floating point instructions
for the '030 to the corresponding '040 instructions. Is this the case? If
so, is this necessarily a run-time translation or are there utilities to let
you recompile your code so that the translation need only be done once.
Along these lines, are there ANY compiliers/utilities for that let you
exploit the floating point power of the '040. Does the Rocket come with any
such tools? If not, and it is the case that run-time translation must
occur, then is the Rocket REALLY 3x faster than a stock ][fx (or only
theoretically 3x faster) at floating-point stuff? Is there anyone out
there who's played with both a ][fx and a Rocket who could give advice?
2. If there's a Rocket under the hood, is there any advantage (as far as
numerical simulations go) to having an fx as opposed to a ci? (wouldn't
both CPUs be converted into I/O processors?). Will a Rocket even fit
into a ci?
3. Not a major concern, but it would be nice if the machine were sys 7
compatible. I've heard that the rocket is almost there, but will it work
at all? Is it just a problem virtual memory and addressing or are there
a lot of patches involved?
Thanks in advance for any insight.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
jsorenso@thesis1.med.uth.tmc.edu | "No matter where you go, there you are"
| -BB
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------