pjh@mccc.uucp (Pete Holsberg) (10/12/89)
Site sscnj has a 3B2/400 running SV R3.0 and a Telebit TB+ on a PORTS card.
Site mccc has a 3B2/400 running SV R3.1 and a TB+ on a PORTS card (although I
could switch it to an EPORTS card if that would help).
Today, sscnj called mccc three times, to pick up a 30453 byte file thatwas
spooled for it. Here's what happened.
1) At 12:10, the file was transferred in 448.96 seconds. mccc's logs shows
many messages like this:
BAD READ (expected 'C' got FAIL)
The file was not removed from the spool queue.
2) At 12:26, sscnj called again. mccc's logs shows
CAUGHT (SIGNAL 1)
at 12:31.
3) At 12:32, sscnj calls again and transfers the file in TWENTY-THREE POINT
EIGHTYFOUR seconds!!
Questions: what can we do to insure reliable communications between sscnj and
mccc, and what on earth is going on?
(mccc has reliable connections to other TB+ sites albeit none with 3B2s.)
Thanks.
--
Pete Holsberg UUCP: {...!rutgers!}princeton!mccc!pjh
Mercer College CompuServe: 70240,334
1200 Old Trenton Road GEnie: PJHOLSBERG
Trenton, NJ 08690 Voice: 1-609-586-4800pjh@mccc.uucp (Pete Holsberg) (10/12/89)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att,u3b.general
Subject: 3b2s communicating poorly
Expires:
References:
Sender:
Reply-To: pjh@mccc.UUCP (Pete Holsberg)
Followup-To:
Distribution: na
Organization: The College on the Other Side of Route 1
Keywords:
Site sscnj has a 3B2/400 running SV R3.0 and a Telebit TB+ on a PORTS card.
Site mccc has a 3B2/400 running SV R3.1 and a TB+ on a PORTS card (although I
could switch it to an EPORTS card if that would help).
Today, sscnj called mccc three times, to pick up a 30453 byte file thatwas
spooled for it. Here's what happened.
1) At 12:10, the file was transferred in 448.96 seconds. mccc's logs shows
many messages like this:
BAD READ (expected 'C' got FAIL)
The file was not removed from the spool queue.
2) At 12:26, sscnj called again. mccc's logs shows
CAUGHT (SIGNAL 1)
at 12:31.
3) At 12:32, sscnj calls again and transfers the file in TWENTY-THREE POINT
EIGHTYFOUR seconds!!
Questions: what can we do to insure reliable communications between sscnj and
mccc, and what on earth is going on?
(mccc has reliable connections to other TB+ sites albeit none with 3B2s.)
Thanks.
--
Pete Holsberg UUCP: {...!rutgers!}princeton!mccc!pjh
Mercer College CompuServe: 70240,334
1200 Old Trenton Road GEnie: PJHOLSBERG
Trenton, NJ 08690 Voice: 1-609-586-4800root@mccc.uucp (0000-Admin(0000)) (10/12/89)
Site sscnj has a 3B2/400 running SV R3.0 and a Telebit TB+ on a PORTS card. Site mccc has a 3B2/400 running SV R3.1 and a TB+ on a PORTS card (although I could switch it to an EPORTS card if that would help). Today, sscnj called mccc three times, to pick up a 30453 byte file thatwas spooled for it. Here's what happened. 1) At 12:10, the file was transferred in 448.96 seconds. mccc's logs shows many messages like this: BAD READ (expected 'C' got FAIL) The file was not removed from the spool queue. 2) At 12:26, sscnj called again. mccc's logs shows CAUGHT (SIGNAL 1) at 12:31. 3) At 12:32, sscnj calls again and transfers the file in TWENTY-THREE POINT EIGHTYFOUR seconds!! Questions: what can we do to insure reliable communications between sscnj and mccc, and what on earth is going on? (mccc has reliable connections to other TB+ sites albeit none with 3B2s.) Thanks.
root@mccc.uucp (Pete Holsberg) (10/12/89)
Sorry for the double posting, but I've been having some strange behavior from
relaynews.
--
Pete Holsberg UUCP: {...!rutgers!}princeton!mccc!pjh
Mercer College CompuServe: 70240,334
1200 Old Trenton Road GEnie: PJHOLSBERG
Trenton, NJ 08690 Voice: 1-609-586-4800