Postmaster@ucl-cs.UUCP (10/05/89)
From: Postmaster@uk.ac.ucl.cs
Your message follows:
Reply-To: comp.object
Path: ucl-cs!nott-cs!ukc!mcsun!uunet!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!rutgers!sunybcs!marvin!axaris
From: axaris@cs.buffalo.edu (Vassilios Axaris)
Newsgroups: comp.object
Subject: Reentrant code
Message-ID: <11242@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU>
Date: 2 Oct 89 14:48:34 GMT
Sender: nobody@acsu.buffalo.edu
Original-Reply-To: axaris@cs.buffalo.edu (Vassilios Axaris)
Organization: SUNY @ Buffalo (Computer Engineering)
Lines: 8
Keywords: reentrant code, object methods
Resent-Date: Wed, 4 Oct 89 22:02:43 BST
Resent-From: news@Cs.Ucl.AC.UK
Resent-To: comp.object@bboards
I have recently read somewhere (most likely a magazine article) that object
oriented code must be non reentrant. Is this statement true? For some reason,
I do not believe it is, since code is shared by objects through inheritance.
But I want to be sure...
Thanks,
Vassilios E. AxarisPostmaster@ucl-cs.UUCP (10/05/89)
From: Postmaster@uk.ac.ucl.cs
Your message follows:
Reply-To: comp.object
Path: ucl-cs!nott-cs!ukc!mcsun!uunet!wuarchive!psuvax1!rutgers!bpa!temvax!stephen
From: stephen@temvax.UUCP (Stephen C. Arnold)
Newsgroups: comp.object
Subject: Object Oriented Programming and Parser Generation?
Message-ID: <194@temvax.UUCP>
Date: 2 Oct 89 13:18:06 GMT
References: <1989Sep30.201033.25047@rpi.edu> <20233@usc.edu>
Original-Reply-To: stephen@temvax.UUCP (Stephen C. Arnold)
Organization: Temple University, Institute for Survey Research
Lines: 12
Keywords: OOLP, logic programming, object oriented programming
Resent-Date: Wed, 4 Oct 89 22:24:08 BST
Resent-From: news@Cs.Ucl.AC.UK
Resent-To: comp.object@bboards
I have just a few :-) questions about object oriented languages and computer
language generation.
Has anyone written a lexical analyser or parser generator in an object
oriented language? Is it in the public domain?
Has anyone done attribute grammar work in an object oriented language? Is
there a good parallel object oriented language? Has anyone looked into using
parallel object oriented languages to capture the parallelism within
attribute grammars? Who, if anybody is doing research in this area? Who's
interested (besides me)?Postmaster@ucl-cs.UUCP (10/05/89)
From: Postmaster@uk.ac.ucl.cs
Your message follows:
Reply-To: comp.object
Path: ucl-cs!nott-cs!ukc!mcsun!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!att!cbnewsl!dog
From: dog@cbnewsl.ATT.COM (edward.n.schiebel)
Newsgroups: comp.object
Subject: Re: Object Oriented Logic Programming
Message-ID: <2088@cbnewsl.ATT.COM>
Date: 2 Oct 89 11:49:50 GMT
References: <1989Sep30.201033.25047@rpi.edu>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 11
Resent-Date: Wed, 4 Oct 89 22:25:18 BST
Resent-From: news@Cs.Ucl.AC.UK
Resent-To: comp.object@bboards
From article <1989Sep30.201033.25047@rpi.edu>, by fargo@pawl.rpi.edu (Irwin M. Fargo):
> If someone could send me or point me to any information on OOLP (specific ex-
> amples such as OOLP languages) would be greatly appreciated.
Smalltalk/V from comes with Prolog/V, an object-oriented prolog within
the Smalltalk system. I have just begun to look at it, so I cannot
tell you very much about it...just that it's there.
Ed Schiebel
AT&T Bell Laboratories
dog@vilya.att.comPostmaster@ucl-cs.UUCP (10/05/89)
From: Postmaster@uk.ac.ucl.cs
Your message follows:
Reply-To: comp.object
Path: ucl-cs!nott-cs!ukc!mcsun!uunet!ginosko!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!polyslo!jearls
From: jearls@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU ( Stupid )
Newsgroups: comp.object
Subject: What is OOP / OOD
Message-ID: <1989Oct2.161552.14306@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU>
Date: 2 Oct 89 16:15:52 GMT
Original-Reply-To: jearls@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU ( Stupid )
Organization: Idiots, Anonymous
Lines: 12
Resent-Date: Wed, 4 Oct 89 22:25:51 BST
Resent-From: news@Cs.Ucl.AC.UK
Resent-To: comp.object@bboards
Sorry if this doesn't belong here, but could someone please tell me
exactly what IS Object Oriented Programming or Object Oriented Design ?
Thanks,
- John
--
_______________________________________________________________________________
Stupid@Idiots.Anonymous.Com | There's an explanation for everything. Tis a pity
jearls@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU | that many of those explanations make no sense.
earlsj@AFAL-EDWARDS.AF.MIL | - The Teachings of Ebenezum, volume LXIX
--------