[fa.info-vax] Choosing a Documant Preparation Package

info-vax@ucbvax.ARPA (01/03/85)

From: Lars Poulsen <LARS@ACC>

I do most of my work in three somewhat distinct environments:

	- VAX/VMS (Vanilla 3.7)
	- TWG Eunice (3.2)
	- 4.2 BSD Unix

After a period of trying to use native tools in each environment,
I have more or less given up on EDT and I now stick to VI on any
system that has it. (Has anybody written a VI emulator for TPU ?)

-----

Next, I have to come to terms with text formatters; it looks like
I am going to have to live without the real nice ones (which I hear
are SCRIBE and TEX) and make do with RUNOFF (DSR) and NROFF/DITROFF.

Ideally, I'd like to have a compatible subset; it looks like it 
oughta be possible to write a DSR emulation in NROFF (provided
you stick to the two-letter versions of the commands), but I
definitely wouldn't want to build it myself. Has anyone done it ?

Our in-house systems support group hacked up a package which I
don't happen to like much, and then they say that if you want
something else (or more) you should use -ms (or was it -me ?).
Not that they'd really support it, of course. Also the inhouse
package cannot be loaded together with -me or -ms.

What do other people do ?
For system managers, how do you overcome the learning/documentation
barrier of nroff ?

			/ Lars Poulsen
			 <Lars@ACC.ARPA>
------

info-vax@ucbvax.ARPA (01/04/85)

From: jose rodriguez <jrodrig@mitre-gateway>


Hey,
	Nothing beats the tuple {emacs,ispell,scribe,dover}. Now I am
stuck with {(vi,ed(!)),spell+edtypo,nroff,(lpt,imagen)} and how I long
for the past. The imagen is not bad though. oh well

Jose
jrodrig@mitre-gw

anyone heard of tops20 in a chip?

info-vax@ucbvax.ARPA (01/05/85)

From: decvax!ittvax!long@BERKELEY (H. Morrow Long [Systems Center])

	Emacs and scribe can be obtained for most versions of Unix.


				H. Morrow Long
				ITT-ATC Systems Center, Shelton, CT
	
path = {allegra bunker dcdvaxb dcdwest ucbvax!decvax duke eosp1 ittral
	lbl-csam mit-eddie psuvax1 purdue qubix qumix research sii
	tmmnet twg uf-cgrl wxlvax yale}!ittvax!long

info-vax@ucbvax.ARPA (01/05/85)

From: Richard Furuta <Furuta@WASHINGTON.ARPA>


-------

info-vax@ucbvax.ARPA (01/05/85)

From: Richard Furuta <Furuta@WASHINGTON.ARPA>

I replied directly to the originator of the message about this but for
the record, let me remind everyone that TeX is also available for
Berkeley Unix (4.1 and 4.2) on the Vax and on the Sun as well as being
available for VMS.  The cost is comparatively low ($75 for the Unix
one, $300 or less for the VMS one).

					--Rick
-------

info-vax@ucbvax.ARPA (01/12/85)

From: ihnp4!houxm!hou2h!pgp@UCB-VAX


   I used EDT and RUNOFF for years and was fairly content.
   They may not be as powerful as UNIX family stuff, but they
   are infinitely better documented.  Sounds like your just
   UNIX bound.