[alt.conspiracy] Nude images removed from wuarchive

battle@cs.utk.edu (David Battle) (03/09/90)

From wuarchive.wustl.edu ~ftp/graphics/gif/R_X_rated/README:

> We're sorry, but the R_X_rated directory of GIF files has been taken
> off-line due to questions about its usefulness as a research and/or
> academic tool as required by the Appropriate Use Guidelines for the
> Internet.

They as though pictures of Bill the Cat (which are still available) are useful
in research but nudes are not.  I can think of at least two uses for images of
nudes in academic/research situations.  One might be a figure drawing class
where art students are studying the human form and another might be sample
images for an image analysis project.

I can't think of any use for a picture of Bill the Cat in research except
maybe to make a poster for said researcher's wall.

They might as well admit that, despite popular demand, you have caved in the
the demands of a prudish minority and succumbed to their censorship.

> If you are a faculty member at a degree granting institution of higher
> learning and you, or a graduate student under your supervision, would
> like to use this material for research or teaching purposes please let
> us know by sending e-mail to archives@wugate.wustl.edu.  We will
> contact you as soon as possible and request a letter describing your
> position and how the material would be used for teaching or research,
> the material will then be returned to the archives.

I have not seen any of these images myself, but until I have I could not
possibly hope to decide whether they might be useful in research.  And if
they are not on-line, how am I supposed to make that decision?  I am not
a faculty member but I hope that some art or image processing (or other)
professor out there will muster his or her courage and request that these
images be returned to the archives.

					-David L. Battle
					 battle@utkux1.utk.edu
--
					-David L. Battle
					 battle@utkux1.utk.edu
					 battle@battle.esd.ornl.gov