Shawn.Hayes@bbs.oit.unc.edu (Shawn Hayes) (06/20/91)
On one of the computers at work we seem to lose our communications ability occasionaly. Today the power went out and all of the computers were turned off(ie. no shutdown was executed). Wehen we brought them back up everything was fine except that one of the RS/6000s was unable to communicate with any other computer. I tried to ping it from another machine without success. When I logged onto the sick computer everything seemed fine, except for network communications. When I tried to ping another computer I got an error message of 'send: no route to host' which ususally implies that the host that I'm trying to connect to isn't in the hosts file. However after looking at all of the configurations in SMIT everything is as it was and thes sick RS/6000 was able to communicate earlier. So I then tried to ping the sick computer from the sick computer without any luck. I got the message that there was no route to host. After trying a few more things, including a reboot, I was at a loss as to what could be wrong. As a final act I shut down the Inet daemon and went to the TCP/IP mininmum configuration menu (the one where you set the host name and IP address). I did not change any data(it was all correct), but did set the start TCP/IP now flag to TRUE and hit enter. After SMIT went through it's configuration process I tired to talk to another host and it worked! CAn someone explain to me why I had to reconfigure TCP/IP to get the communications working even though everything was set as it had been?? Is there a quicker way to accomplish the same goal and ,most importantly, how can I prevent this problem from re-occuring? The macomputer in question is an RS/6000 320 with Aix V3.1 with the 3005 patches. Thanks. Shawn Hayes -- The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service. internet: bbs.oit.unc.edu or 128.109.157.30
robin@batman (Robin D. Wilson) (06/21/91)
In article <4136@beguine.UUCP> Shawn.Hayes@bbs.oit.unc.edu (Shawn Hayes) writes: > When I logged onto the sick computer everything seemed fine, except for > network communications. When I tried to ping another computer I got an > error message of 'send: no route to host' which ususally implies that > the host that I'm trying to connect to isn't in the hosts file. However > after > looking at all of the configurations in SMIT everything is as it was and > thes sick RS/6000 was able to communicate earlier. So I then tried to ping > the sick computer from the sick computer without any luck. I got the message > that there was no route to host. Actually, "no route to host" implies that the network interface (en0) was not active. I suggest that you verify 2 things: 1) en0 is configured; and 2) inetd is running (if this ever happens again). -- +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |The views expressed herein, are the sole responsibility of the typist at hand| +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |UUCP: pensoft!robin | |USNail: 701 Canyon Bend Dr. | | Pflugerville, TX 78660 | | Home: (512)251-6889 Work: (512)343-1111 | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+