sfnatldc@cdp.uucp (08/24/89)
/* Written 3:19 pm Aug 22, 1989 by sfnatldc in cdp:nwfc.lobby */ /* ---------- "Weekly Legislative Report 8/21/89" ---------- */ The Weekly Legislative Report is updated on the second business day of each week by the SANE/FREEZE: Campaign for Global Security Legislative Department. This report is based on the political objectives adopted by the SANE/FREEZE National Congress. Please help us by reporting your local lobbying activities to Mark W. Harrison at (202) 546-7100 or send us a message via "mail" on PeaceNet to sfnatldc. ******************************************************************** SANE/FREEZE: CAMPAIGN FOR GLOBAL SECURITY 3RD ANNUAL NATIONAL CONGRESS NOVEMBER 16-19, 1989 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA For more information contact Randy Coffin in the national office at (202) 546-7100 after Sept. 1. Brochures have been mailed. BE THERE!! ******************************************************************* GREETINGS!! - Your Lobbyist has returned. UPDATE **Current status and messages for ongoing lobbying** DO NOTHING SENATE ON ARMS CONTROL During the week of July 31, the Senate completed floor consideration of the FY 90 Defense Authorization bill. This body of "distinguished men and women" rejected all arms control amendments. The amendments rejected were: *Johnston amendment to freeze SDI funding at last year's level - Rejected 50-47 *Kennedy amendment to stop site preparation of SIS - Rejected 50-49 *Levin amendment to cut $502 million for MX Rail Garrison - Rejected 61-39 The Kerry-Jeffords amendment on an ASAT moratorium was not offered because of a cloture vote to limit debate on the bill. Yes, we and and Sens. Kerry and Jeffords are angry over this. The amendment will be offered when the Senate considers the FY 90 Defense Appropriations bill in September. On the B-2 Bomber program - the Senate approved a number of restrictions on the program. The number of planes that could be procured in FY 90 and 91 was not cut as in the House. Did the Senate do anything right? Yes, one thing. They rejected a Bond amendment to earmark $100 million for development of an accidental-launch protection system (ALPS) by a vote of 53-44. Like SDI, ALPS would violate the ABM Treaty. If you wish to know how your Senators voted on the amendments above, call the SANE/FREEZE Legislative Department at (202) 546-7100. CONFERENCE COMMITTEE ON THE FY 90 DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION BILL The Conference Committee, made up of Members (conferees) of the House and Senate Armed Services Committees, will meet in early September to iron out differences in House and Senate versions of the FY 90 Defense Authorization bill. House conferees may be announced as soon as the August reqy.nH9+=n September 6. Senate conferees on arms control issues are usually Members of the Strategic Forces and Nuclear Deterrence Subcommittee: Exon (D-NE), Levin (D-MI), Kennedy (D-MA), Bingaman (D-NM), Glenn (D-OH), Gore (D-TN), Thurmond (R-SC), Cohen (R-ME), Wilson (R-CA), Wallop (R-WY), and Gorton (R-WA). House and Senate conferees will have to strike compromises on a number of key programs: *Star Wars - The House approved $3.1 billion; the Senate $4.5 billion. *MX/Midgetman - The House cut $502 million of the $1.1 billion request for MX Rail Garrison and eliminated funds for Migetman. The Senate approved the $1.1 billion request for MX Rail Garrison and $100 million for Midgetman. *B-2 Bomber - The House approved funds for two planes in FY 90 and components for two more planes in FY 91. The Senate approved the request to buy three planes in FY 90 and components for five planes in FY 91. House level of funding $3.9 billion; Senate $4.4 billion. *SIS - The House adopted language which forbids site preparation at the SIS site in Idaho. The Senate version allows site preparation. *Cleanup Funds - The House approved an additional $335 million; the Senate approved an additional $418 million plus an additional $100 million for cleanup technology development. (In this program, the Senate did better than the House.) *Study Commission - The Senate bill would establish a Blue Ribbon Task Force to review the long-term funding of and requirements for environmental restoration and waste activities. The special panel would complete its work by January 15, 1991. No similar provision was adopted by the House. Message: If your Representative or Senator is a conferee urge him/her to: 1) Maintain spending levels for Star Wars, MX and B-2 Bomber adopted by the House. Stand firm on no money for the Midgetman. 2) Support Senate spending levels for DOE cleanup and the House prohibition of on site preparation of SIS. If your Representative and Senators are not conferees, urge them to lobby conferees on the above points. DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS BILLS On August 4, the House approved a $286 billion Defense Appropriations bill for FY 90. It rolled into the bill spending levels and arms control provisions that were adopted in the FY 90 Defense Authorization bill. The Senate will consider its version of the FY 90 Defense Appropriations bill in middle or late September. Two key arms control amendments will be offered: *Kerry-Jeffords amendment to prohibit funds for the testing of anti- satellite (ASAT) weapons as long as the Soviet Union refrains from such tests *Leahy amendment to kill the B-2 Bomber program. Message: Urge your Senators to support the amendments above. ECONOMIC CONVERSION If we are going to pass economic conversion legislation in the first session of the 101st Congress, then September is the month. During that month House and Senate Banking Committees, which are no longer burdened by S&Ls, will consider the Defense Production Act (DPA), a bill which is reauthorized every two years. [The DPA makes sure that the industrial base of the economic is adequate just in case of war.] It is the DPA that will serve as a vehicle to attach conversion legislation. The House version of the DPA, H.R. 486 (Oakar bill), includes a provision on economic conversion which is not as comprehensive as the Weiss economic conversion bill, H.R. 101. Reps. Gejdenson (D- CT) and Mavroules (D-MA) have introduced an economic conversion bill, H.R. 2852, which is weaker than the program in the DPA. In a review of each of these bills, the National Commission on Economic Conversion and Disarmament, an organization set-up by conversion expert Seymour Melman, found that on the bases of 11 criteria for a conversion program, the Gejdenson-Mavroules bill met 2 1/2, the Oakar bill met 7, and the Weiss bill met all 11. (For a copy of this review, contact the SANE/FREEZE Legislative Department.) No economic conversion legislative has been introduced in the Senate. Message: 1) Urge your Representative to co-sponsor the Weiss economic conversion bill, H.R. 101. Present co-sponsors of H.R. 101 are: Weiss, Ackerman, Dellums, Fauntroy, Oberstar, Mavroules, Kastenmeier, Gejdenson, Torres, Roe, Studds, Bates, Rangel, Garcia, Boxer, Wheat, Moakley, Crockett, Espy, Mfume, Hayes (IL), Dymally, Stokes, Pelosi, Berman, Owens (NY), Kildee, Towns, Brown (CA), Markey, Nowak, Clay, Solarz, Wolpe, Collins, Dwyer (NJ), DeFazio, Swift, McDermott, Matsui, Campbell (CO), Jontz, Bustamante, Kennedy, Richardson, Feighan, Martinez and Sangmeister. 2) If your Representative is a Member of the Economic Stabilization Subcommittee of the House Banking Committee urge him/her to substitute the Weiss conversion bill, H.R. 101, for the economic conversion provision (Title II) already in the DPA. Key Members are: Oakar (D-OH), LaFalce (D-NY), Vento (D-MN), Kaptur (D-OH), Kanjorski (D-PA), Garcia (D-NY), Patterson (D-SC), Neal (D- MA), Saiki (R-HI) and Roukema (R-NJ). 3) Urge Members of the Senate Banking Committee to attach the Weiss economic conversion bill to their version of the DPA. (Has not been written) Key Members are: Riegle (D-MI), Cranston (D-CA), Sarbanes (D-MD), Dodd (D-CT), Dixon (D-IL), Sasser (D-TN), Sanford (D-NC), Shelby (D-AL), Graham (D-FL), Wirth (D-CO), Kerry (D-MA), Bryan (D-NV), Heinz (R-PA), D'Amato (R-NY) and Kassebaum (R-KS). Talking points for economic conversion: 1. The Cold War is winding down. 2. The defense industry has begun to layoff workers in large numbers. A significant number of military bases are closing. 3. Military spending is not increasing as fast. 4. Conversion is essential for disarmament planning. 5. Conversion will encourage new employment opportunities, provide resources for social investment needs and public infrastructure, and help make American competitive. 6. Conversion saves jobs of defense-dependent workers and communities. DOE ISSUES 1) International Plutonium Control Act - It is possible that there may be hearing on this bill (S. 1047) in the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee in September. These hearings would help highlight the issue and would provide support for a version of the bill to be voted out of Conference Committee on the FY 90 Defense Authorization bill. Message: If your Senator(s) is a Member of the Foreign Affairs Committee, please urge him/her to push for a hearing on the binding version of the International Plutonium Control Act. Members are: Pell, Biden, Sarbanes, Cranston, Dodd, Kerry, Simon, Sanford, Moynihan, Robb, Helms, Lugar, Kassebaum, Boschwitz, Pressler, Murkowski, McConnell, Humphrey and Mack. 2) Glenn Bill - Sen. John Glenn (D-OH) introduced the DOE Nuclear Safety and Environmental Act, S. 1304, in July. This eight-title reform bill would require approval by four separate Senate committees, and thus is not expected to reach the Senate floor as written. Specific parts of the bill may be attached as amendments to other bills or introduced separate as separate bills. It deals with DOE facility health and safety, OSHA compliance, independent oversight, and environmental oversight. 3) Yes, yes the trust fund bill as finally been introduced. The Federal Nuclear Facilities Environmental Response Act, H.R. 3065 and S. 1462, was introduced by Rep. Norm Dicks (D-WA) and Sen. Brock Adams (D-WA) on August 2. This bill would establish a federal trust fund to finance cleanup at DOE sites. Revenues would come from primarily DOE's defense budget. Additional sources would be DOE's civilian nuclear budget; commercial users of DOE nuclear services, such as uranium enrichment for nuclear utilities; and environmental fines. The bill creates a DOE Office of Environmental Management and Remedial Action, requires DOE to prepare five-year cleanup plans, creates a grant program for state enforcement, and establishes a joint DOE/EPA cleanup research program. Message: Urge your Senators to co-sponsor the Glenn bill, S. 1304 and the Adams bill, S. 1462. Urge your Representative to support the Dicks bill, H.R. 3065. --- Patt Haring | UNITEX : United Nations patth@sci.ccny.cuny.edu | Information patth@ccnysci.BITNET | Transfer Exchange -=- Every child smiles in the same language. -=-
djones@decwrl.dec.com (Dave Jones) (08/26/89)
>From article <2772@ccnysci.UUCP>, by sfnatldc@cdp.uucp: ... > > Did the Senate do anything right? Yes, one thing. They rejected a > Bond amendment to earmark $100 million for development of an > accidental-launch protection system (ALPS) by a vote of 53-44. I know absolutely nothing about this, but it would seem on the face of it that $100 million is a very small percentage of the defence budget, (less than one percent?), and that accidental launches are potentially rather embarrassing, and might better be avoided. What gives? > Like SDI, ALPS would violate the ABM Treaty. Oh? --- Patt Haring | UNITEX : United Nations patth@sci.ccny.cuny.edu | Information patth@ccnysci.BITNET | Transfer Exchange -=- Every child smiles in the same language. -=-