unitex@rubbs.fidonet.org (unitex) (09/12/89)
South Africa in recent years. In reply to a question, he said that even if South Africa managed to circumvent certain sanctions, that would cost money. He urged an embargo on technology, an area where the South African economy was particularly vulnerable. There were increasing numbers of whites who wanted to eliminate apartheid; but there were also significant numbers who would not even "sacrifice a tree in their garden" to get rid of apartheid. International pressure had to remain on South Africa. JOHN VENDERVERKEN, General Secretary of the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU), said that despite the talk of reform in South Africa, nothing had changed: the state of emergency declared four years ago remained in force and the structures of the apartheid system remained intact. The regime continued to use force to suppress even peaceful protests and demonstrations. Its strategy in talking about negotiations aimed at exchanging one form of apartheid for another. Transnational corporations had a major influence on the future of apartheid and could contribute positively to a peaceful solution in South Africa, he said. However, many major transnationals were not only unwilling to join and support the international campaign for sanctions, but were willing partners of the regime, and worked to support the current system. In l988, the ICFTU had published a comprehensive list, exposing those companies that claimed to have withdrawn while maintaining their interests in the country through licensing arrangements or franchising. Where disinvestment had taken place, it had generally been a policy aimed at protecting a company's financial interests with little regard for workers' rights. Efforts by transnational corporations to create an impression that sanctions against South Africa would harm working people had been rebutted forcefully by trade unions. Both the Congress of South African Trade Unions and the National Council of Trade Unions had stated clearly that they believed imposition of sanctions was the last peaceful measure left to put pressure on South Africa. But the terms of disinvestment should be subject to negotiation with the trade unions concerned. He said that the ICFTU called for: --Extension of the arms embargo to include sales by South African subsidiaries of transnational corporations; --Tightening of the definition of arms sales to include all types of equipment intended for use by South Africa's military, security and police services; --A ban on sales of machinery to South African arms-producing companies; --A ban on the purchase of South African-produced arms and strengthened international monitoring to ensure compliance by all major industrial countries; --Ending of investment guarantees, export credits and all trade promotion measures; a product by product programme to divert import and export trade from South Africa; and prevention of new investment in South Africa by transnationals. He said there should be a programme of compulsory disinvestment by transnationals -- including all those companies which had been identified by the independent black trade union movement as being in violation of internationally accepted standards of labour practice culminating in the adoption of mandatory United Nations sanctions to endorse the economic isolations of South Africa. MARION GRAFIN DUNHOFF, Editor and Publisher of Die Zeit, Federal Republic of Germany, said that Bonn's South African policy was that apartheid could not be reformed, but had to be abolished and that dialogue must begin immediately with the legitimate representatives of the South African people. She said sanctions and disinvestment measures had existed for years, but the effect on apartheid had been negligible. The only sanctions that would be effective would be of a financial nature, not based on trade. The Federal Republic of Germany was opposed to economic sanctions to achieve political ends. Asked why she did not believe that negotiations could not go forward along with increased trade sanctions, Ms. Dunhoff said she did not think that sanctions should be abolished, but that they had not been very effective. She felt that black people were more pragmatic than white people, who were more dogmatic. Panel Membership Members of the Panel of eminent persons on the public hearing on transnational corporations in South Africa on Namibia are: --Abdelatif Al-Hamad, Secretary-General of the Arab Development Bank and former Minister of Finance of Kuwait; --Canaan Banana, first President of Zimbabwe and former Chancellor of the University of Zimbabwe; --Anatoly Gromyko, Director of the African Institute of the USSR Academy of Sciences; --Dame Judith Hart, member of the United Kingdom House of Lords; --Kamal Hossain, former Minister of Law and Parliamentary Affairs, former Foreign Minister of Bangladesh and an Expert Adviser to the United Nations Commission on Transnational Corporations; --Mochtar Kusuma Atmadja, former Foreign Minister of Indonesia; --Wole Soyinka, Nobel Laureate in Literature; lecturer and teacher of the University of Ife (Nigeria); --Lowell Weicker, former United States Senator from Connecticut; --Flora MacDonald, former member of Parliament of Canada; Secretary of State for External Affairs; Minister of Employment and Immigration; Minister of Communications; --Edward Seaga, former Prime Minister of Jamaica; and --Francis Blanchard, former Director-General of the International Labour Organisation (ILO). * Origin: UNITEX --> Toward a United Species (1:107/501) --- Patt Haring | UNITEX : United Nations patth@sci.ccny.cuny.edu | Information patth@ccnysci.BITNET | Transfer Exchange -=- Every child smiles in the same language. -=-