[misc.headlines.unitex] <1/3> FINANCIAL MEASURES AGAINST SOUTH AFRICA DISCUSSED

unitex@rubbs.fidonet.org (unitex) (09/12/89)

FINANCIAL MEASURES AGAINST SOUTH AFRICA DISCUSSED
     AT HEARINGS ON ACTIVITIES OF TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS

     (Received from the UN Information Service.)

     GENEVA, 4 September -- The panel of eminent persons conducting
     public hearings on the role of transnational corporations in
     South Africa and Namibia discussed this afternoon the issue of
     financial measures against South Africa.

     Statements were made by Hudar Cars, spokesman for Sweden's
     Liberal Party; Terry Crawford-Browne, a former South African
     banker and currently an adviser to Bishop Desmond Tutu and the
     Rev. Alan Boesak; John Lind, a research analyst from San
     Francisco; Keith Ovenden, author of a newly-published book
     entitled Apartheid and International Finance:  a Programme for
     Change; and Donna Katzin, of the Interfaith Center on Corporate
     Responsibility, New York.

     Statements

     HUDAR CARS, spokesman of the Liberal Party of Sweden, said his
     country was strongly dependent on international trade; some 50
     per cent of its industrialized products were exported.  To
     Sweden, sanctions was "not a tool to be played with".

     The proper organ to decide about economic sanctions was the
     United Nations Security Council, he said.  In the United
     Nations, Sweden had again and again spoken in favour of
     mandatory and comprehensive sanctions against the apartheid
     regime.  It had supported the 1977 decision on the arms embargo
     as it considered that the present situation in southern Africa
     constituted a threat for international peace and security.

     The reluctance of the Security Council to go much further than it
     had done so far -- due to the power of the veto of permanent
     members -- had prompted Sweden to take actions on its own, he
     said.  The recommendations of the Security Council in the
     economic field had been interpreted by Sweden in a positive
     manner and its actions had gradually been extended.

     He said the reason why Sweden had felt that it should extend its
     actions was the uniqueness of apartheid.  Nowhere else had
     racism become the corner stone of the legal framework of a
     State.  That made the present situation in South Africa both
     totally unique and completely unacceptable.  That was also the
     reason why the Swedish Government and a strong majority in the
     Parliament had strongly objected any proposal to apply
     unilateral sanctions against any other regime.

     As a consequence of the Swedish disinvestment law of l979 and
     further related legislation, the number of Swedish owned
     subsidiaries in South Africa had gradually decreased -- from 12
     to five companies.  The seven had sold out or closed.  The
     remaining five were mainly in the mining sector.  The question
     was whether they would be able to continue very long in South
     Africa in their present forms.

     He said it was sometimes questioned -- and not only by the
     Swedish companies and trade unions directly concerned -- whether
     the policy of disinvestment would in a longer perspective, be
     considered beneficial to the non-racial state of South Africa
     which would emerge and for its relations with Sweden.  The
     recommendation of the Swedish authorities to the companies were,
     however, to substitute their presence in South Africa with new
     investments in the front-line States.  But so far, not much had
     happened in this field.  Some $500 million -- 50 per cent of
     Sweden's bilateral and programme -- was allocated to the
     front-line States.  It was important that the policy of
     disinvestment be continued until major changes had occured in
     South Africa.

     He said the Swedish sanction policy with regard to South Africa
     was already fairly complete and would soon be about as tight as
     possible.  An area where there was some discussion about the
     usefulness of tight sanctions concerned the granting of visas to
     South Africans to visit Sweden.  Today it was more or less
     required that the applicant for a visa should be able to prove
     that he or she had taken a firm stand against apartheid.  The
     argument against this practice was that it may be useful if
     ordinary white South Africans were exposed to the way of
     thinking in countries like Sweden.

 * Origin: UNITEX --> Toward a United Species (1:107/501)

---
Patt Haring                | UNITEX : United Nations 
patth@sci.ccny.cuny.edu    |          Information
patth@ccnysci.BITNET       |          Transfer Exchange 
  -=- Every child smiles in the same language. -=-