[misc.headlines.unitex] <1/3> ACTIVITIES OF TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS IN SOUTH

unitex@rubbs.fidonet.org (unitex) (09/12/89)

ACTIVITIES OF TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS IN SOUTH AFRICA AND NAMIBIA

     FIVE MORE STATEMENTS HEARD IN PUBLIC HEARINGS ON ACTIVITIES OF
     TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS IN SOUTH AFRICA AND NAMIBIA

     GENEVA, 5 September --  Public hearings on the role of
     transnational corporations in South Africa and Namibia continued
     this morning in Geneva.

     The hearings which began in Geneva yesterday, are being conducted
     by a panel of eminent persons, serving in their personal
     capacity, appointed by Secretary-General Javier Perez de
     Cuellar.

     Statements this morning were made by Kaare Willoch, former Prime
     Minister of Norway;  Manfred Graf von Roon, representing the
     International Chamber of Commerce;  and Rudolph Gruber, Director
     of the South Africa Foundation of the Federal Republic of
     Germany.

     A statement on United Nations activities in the field of human
     rights was made by the Deputy Director of the Centre for Human
     Rights, Kwadwo Nyamekye, on behalf of the
     Under-Secretary-General for Human Rights, Jan Martenson.

     KAARE WILLOCH, former Prime Minister of Norway, said Norway
     introduced in l987 a general ban on goods reaching Norway from
     South Africa and Namibia and the export of goods to South Africa
     and Namibia from Norway.  There was also a ban on the transport
     of passengers or cargo to or from Norway and South Africa and
     Namibia.

     He said trade sanctions had had little impact on South Africa
     thus far, though they were certainly felt in some branches of
     industry.  Other branches were happy as their products replaced
     imports and were thus accorded a form of protectionism.

     In his view, social and economic pressures would ultimately end
     apartheid.  There was some merit in the opinion that existing
     Western firms be encouraged to train blacks and develop a
     constructive relationship with black trade unions.

     The most effective part of the sanctions programme were the
     purely financial ones, such as restrictions on loans.  This had
     a substantial impact on South African economic policy.
     Government and business leaders in South Africa were much more
     concerned on financial sanctions than on any other form of
     sanctions.

     In reply to a question, he said certain trade sanctions could
     result in higher unemployment and lead to a revolutionary
     situation and away from attempts to achieve a peaceful
     transition from apartheid.  The economic and social factors in
     South Africa were such that it would be impossible to uphold
     apartheid.

     KWADWO NYAMEKYE, Deputy Director of the United Nations Centre for
     Human Rights, speaking on behalf of the Under-Secretary-General
     for Human Rights, Jan Martenson, said the elimination of
     apartheid was one of the prime objectives of the United Nations
     activities in the field of human rights.  It had established a
     specific organ with a mandate to lead the combat against
     apartheid, the Special Committee against Apartheid.  Moreover,
     the Commission on Human Rights and almost all other human rights
     organs of the United Nations had repeatedly taken firm stands
     against apartheid.  As long as apartheid was allowed to
     continue, the achievements of societies all over the world in
     guaranteeing human rights and equality through law would be
     endangered and no group would be completely free from the
     spectre of eventual subjugation to a similar system.

     He said the Commission on Human Rights had established in l967 an
     Ad Hoc Working Group of Experts to study human rights violations
     in southern Africa. The Group had produced a number of studies
     concerning the question of apartheid from the point of view of
     international penal law, paving the way for the preparation of
     international conventions on the suppression and punishment of
     crimes of apartheid.  The Commission had also established a
     group to consider reports submitted by States parties to that
     Convention.

     The group reported that the role played by transnational
     corporations in South Africa exhausted South African and
     Namibian natural resources, which belonged to the people;
     exploited the labour force of that region with the single aim of
     making larger profits, and, by operating in South Africa and
     Namibia, they strengthened the apartheid regime, helped to
     perpetuate the oppression of the African majority and enhanced
     the repression against those fighting for their independence.

     He said the Commission on Human Rights had reaffirmed its view
     that the activities of transnational corporations operating in
     South Africa perpetuated the crime of apartheid.  It condemned

 * Origin: UNITEX --> Toward a United Species (1:107/501)

---
Patt Haring                | UNITEX : United Nations 
patth@sci.ccny.cuny.edu    |          Information
patth@ccnysci.BITNET       |          Transfer Exchange 
  -=- Every child smiles in the same language. -=-