jvahey@cdp.uucp (10/08/89)
/* Written 10:58 pm Oct 5, 1989 by jvahey in cdp:gen.nativeam */ /* ---------- "American Indian Religious Freedom " ---------- */ American Indian Religious Freedom Act and proposed amendments Included: American Indian Religious Freedom Act (of 1978) H.R. 1546 proposed bill by Mr. Udall S. 1124 proposed bill by Mr. McCain Please note the differences between the two bills in terms of what conditions are required to challenge an agency action and what conditions the agency would then need to meet as well as the criteria used to make this decision. To my knowledge at this time, these are in committee. If anyone has any information on status of either of these bills, or any proposed changes, please post a reply to this topic and/or send email to jvahey@cdp.uucp. Select Committee on Indian Affairs (202) 224-2251 FAX:(202) 224-2309 MAJORITY MEMBERS Daniel K.Inouye, Hawaii, Chairman Dennis DeConcini, Ariz. Quentin N. Burdick, N.D. Thomas A. Daschle, S.D. Kent Conrad, N.D. MINORITY MEMBERS John McCain, Ariz., Vice Chairman Frank H. Murkowski, Alaska Thad Cochran, Miss. $ 1996. Protection and preservation of traditional reli- gions of Native Americans. On and after August 11, 1978, it shall be the policy of the United States to protect and pre- serve for American Indians their inherent right of freedom to believe, express, and exercise the traditional religions of the American Indian, Eskimo, Aleut, and Native Hawaiians, including but not limited to access to sites, use and pos- session of sacred objects, and the freedom to worship through ceremonials and traditional rites. (Pub.L. 95-341, $ 1, Aug. 11,1978, 92 Stat. 469.) SHORT TITLE Pub. L. 95-341, which enacted this section and a pro- vision set out as a note under this section, is popularly known as the American Indian Religious Freedom Act. FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION OF PROTECTIVE AND PRESER- VATION FUNCTIONS RELATING TO NATIVE AMERICAN RELIGIOUS CULTURAL RIGHTS AND PRACTICES; PRES- DENTIAL REPORT TO CONGRESS Section 2 of Pub. L. 95-341 provided that the Presi- dent direct the various Fedral departments, agencies, and other instrumentalities responsible for adminis- tering relevant laws to evaluate their policies and pro- cedures in consultation with native traditional reli- gious leaders to determine changes necessary to pre- serve Native American religious cultural rights and practices and report to the Congress 12 months after Aug. 11, 1978 SECTION REFERRED TO IN OTHER SECTIONS This section is referred to in title 16 section 470ii. 101st CONGRESS H.R. 1546 1ST Session To amend the American Indian Religious Freedom Act of 1978 ------------------------------------ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 21, 1989 Mr. Udall introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs ==================================== A BILL To amend the American Indian Religious Freedom Act of 1978. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, Section 1. This Act may be cited as the "American Indian Religious Freedom Act Amendments of 1989". Sec. 2. The American Indian Religious Freedom Act (42 U.S.C. 1996) is amended by adding the following new section 3: "Sec. 3. (a) Absent a compelling Federal interest, Fed- eral lands that have historically been either part of, or neces- sary to, or been used by, a traditional Native American reli- gion, shall not be managed in a manner that will pose a sub- stantial and realistic threat to undermine and frustrate any traditional Native American religious practices. "(b) The United States district courts shall have the au- thority to issue such orders as may be necessary to enforce the provisions of this section. "(c) Any party challenging an agency action under this section will have the burden to prove that the proposed action will pose a substantial and realistic threat to under- mine and frustrate a traditional Native American religious practice.If such threat is established, the Federal agency will have the burden to demonstrate that the Federal interest is compelling. If the Federal interest is found to be compelling, the Federal agency shall have the duty to select the course of action that is the least intrustive on such Native American Religious practices.". *** 101st CONGRESS S. 1124 1ST Session To provide a means to ensure that the management of Federal lands does not undermine and frustrate traditional Native American religious practices. ---------------------------------------- IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES June 6 (legislative day,January 3), 1989 Mr. McCain introduced the following bill;which was read twice and referred to the Select Committee on Indian Affairs ---------------------------------------- A BILL To provide a means to ensure that the management of Federal lands does not undermine and frustrate traditional Native American religious practices. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. This Act may be cited as the "American Indian Religious Freedom Act Amendments of 1989". SEC. 2. The Congress finds that -- (1) unlike any other established religion, many traditional Native American religions hold certain lands or natural formations to be sacred; (2) such sacred sites are an integral and vital part of the Native American religions and the religious practices associated with such religions; (3) many of these sacred sites are found on lands which were formerly part of the aboriginal territory of the Indians but which now are held by the Federal Government; and (4) lack of sensitivity or understanding of tradi- tional Native American religions on the part of Federal agencies vested with the management of Federal lands has resulted in the lack of a coherent policy for the management of sacred sites found on Federal lands and has also resulted in the infringement of religious free- dom for Native Americans. SEC. 3. Public Law 95-341 (42 U.S.C. 1996) , popular- ly known as the American Indian Religious Freedom Act, is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new sec- tion: "SEC. 3. (a) Except as otherwise provided in this sec- tion, Federal lands that -- "(1) have historically been considered sacred and indispensable by a traditional Native American reli- gion, and "(2) are necessary to the conduct of a Native American religious practice, shall not be managed in a manner that will pose a substantial and realistic threat of undermining and frustrating such reli- gion or religious practice. "(b)(1) Subsection (a) shall not apply to management de- cisions which are necessary to -- "(A) carry out the legal responsibilities of the Federal Government, "(B) protect a compelling governmental interest, or "(C) protect a vested property right. "(2) In making management decisions described in para- graph (1), the Federal agency shall attempt to accommodate the various competing interests and shall, to the greatest extent feasible, select the course of action that is the least intrusive on traditional Native American religions or religious practices. "(3) Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as re- quiring any Federal agency to totally deny public access to Federal lands. "(c)(1) The United States district courts shall have juris- diction over any civil action brought by any person to enforce the provisions of this section and may issue such orders as may be necessary to enforce the provisions of this section. "(2) Any person challenging a decision of a Federal agency in a civil action brought under this subsection shall have the burden of proving that the decision of the Federal agency will pose a substantial and realistic threat of under- mining and frustrating a traditional Native American religion or religious practice.If such threat is established, the Federal agency shall have the burden of demonstrating that the Federal agency's decision is based on one or more of the criteria in subsection (b)(1). If the Federal agency's decision is found to have been based on one or more of the criteria in subsec- tion (b)(1), then the Federal agency shall have the burden of proving that it selected the course of action that is the least intrusive on the Native American religion or religious prac- tice." *** --- Patt Haring | United Nations | Did u read patth@sci.ccny.cuny.edu | Information | misc.headlines.unitex patth@ccnysci.BITNET | Transfer Exchange | today? -=- Every child smiles in the same language. -=-