[misc.headlines.unitex] UN ASSEMBLY SESSION -- TAKE 12

unitex@rubbs.fidonet.org (unitex) (10/12/89)

UN  ASSEMBLY SESSION -- TAKE 12

     Posting Date: 10/09/89        Copyright UNITEX Communications, 1989
     UNITEX Network, USA           ISSN: 1043-7932

     The President of the Assembly then called on those
     representatives who wished to speak in explanation of vote.

     Mr. TAKHTERAVANCHI (Iran) said he had voted in favour to express
     support for the heroic uprising of the Palestinian people.  To
     eradicate the brutal practice being inflicted on the Palestinian
     people, international measures must be broadened in all occupied
     territories.  His country had never recognized the "Zionist
     entity".  In light of that, he wished to place on the record his
     reservations about the voting on the resolution.

     Mr. WATSON (United States) said that the position of his
     Government was well known.  He called for restraint on the part
     of both the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and Israel,
     adding that while Israel must act within Geneva protocols, he
     recognized its need to maintain order.

     He urged dialogue and negotiations, saying that that alone would
     lead to settlement of the conflict.  The resolution was
     one-sided and did not help alleviate the situation.  Such
     resolutions "poisoned the atmosphere".

     Important negotiations leading to elections in conformance with
     Security Council resolutions 242 and 338, were now underway, he
     said.

     YVES FORTIER (Canada) said he had voted in favour to support the
     principle that Canada had always supported.  He believed the
     Geneva Convention was a fundamental instrument of international
     law that must always be applied.  The violation of the
     Convention by the Israeli authorities was not acceptable.
     However, he regretted that the text contained unhelpful
     elements.  The violence had not been one-sided.

     FERNANDO CISTERNAS (Chile) said that his delegation voted in
     favour of the resolution although it thought that it did not
     preserve the necessary balance.  Chile considered that the
     resolution should have included a generalized condemnation and
     should have appealed to all parties concerned without
     distinction.

     Mr. GRONDAL (Iceland) referred to the statement of the Foreign
     Minister of Iceland before the General Assembly on 4 October
     urging negotiation and restraint from violence.  Iceland
     supported the 10-point plan of President Mubarak of Egypt and
     welcomed the advent of elections in the occupied territory.

     PETER STEPHEN WILENSKI (Australia) said that he had voted in
     favour because it was consistent with the long-standing concern
     about violations of human rights by the Israeli authorities.
     There were aspects of the resolution, however, that were not
     balanced.  There should be not only an understanding of the
     situation in the territories, but of the historical situation in
     which Israel found itself, one of 41 years of violence.

 * Origin: UNITEX --> Toward a United Species (1:107/501)


---
Patt Haring                | United Nations    | Did u read 
patth@sci.ccny.cuny.edu    | Information       | misc.headlines.unitex
patth@ccnysci.BITNET       | Transfer Exchange | today? 
          -=- Every child smiles in the same language. -=-