jmsellens@watdragon.waterloo.edu (08/31/89)
From: "John M. Sellens" <jmsellens> | From kcwellsch@watmath.waterloo.edu Wed Aug 30 09:16:32 1989 | From: Ken Wellsch <kcwellsch@watmath> | To: jmsellens@watdragon (John M. Sellens) | Subject: Re: watfun and man pages | Cc: dgharriss@watmath, wcwince@watmath | | | From jmsellens@watdragon.waterloo.edu Wed Aug 30 03:06:30 1989 | | | | If watfun is so short of disk space, why does it have man pages? | | More so considering I'm currently feeding it man pages from primary=orchid, | secondary=lily since I didn't want the "reformatting" problem and there | isn't room to do a "catman" on watfun. | So is someone going to remove them? What the hell - I did (since the man command couldn't get to them). fun now has 20MB free instead of 8
echrzanowski@watmath.waterloo.edu (Edward Chrzanowski) (08/31/89)
In article <16210@watdragon.waterloo.edu> jmsellens@watdragon.waterloo.edu writes: |From: "John M. Sellens" <jmsellens> | || From kcwellsch@watmath.waterloo.edu Wed Aug 30 09:16:32 1989 || || | From jmsellens@watdragon.waterloo.edu Wed Aug 30 03:06:30 1989 || | || | If watfun is so short of disk space, why does it have man pages? || || More so considering I'm currently feeding it man pages from primary=orchid, || secondary=lily since I didn't want the "reformatting" problem and there || isn't room to do a "catman" on watfun. || |So is someone going to remove them? |What the hell - I did (since the man command couldn't get to them). | |fun now has 20MB free instead of 8 Watfun should have even more space now that the source for the f77 packages has been removed. ED C