[news.announce.newgroups] New formal propsal: "rec.aquarium"

bryce@cbmvax.commodore.com (Bryce Nesbitt) (10/19/89)

[As with the sci.aquaria proposal, this is a violation of the provision of
the guidelines that requires naming issues to be resolved before calling for
a vote. The author insists on posting it anyway. --moderator]

I hereby formally propose a new newsgroup to be called "rec.aquarium".
This group is intended as a simple mainstream translation of the currently
successful and high quality group "alt.aquaria".  The charter remains the
same:

  OLD:	alt.aquaria		The aquarium & related as a hobby.
  NEW:	rec.aquarium		The aquarium & related as a hobby.

Mail your YES or NO vote one of the addresses listed below.  Vote changes
are allowed, note in the subject and body that you are changing.

		uunet!cbmvax!bryce
		bryce@commodore.COM
		rutgers!cbmvax!bryce
		bryce@cbmvax.UUCP

Your subject line must contain your YES, NO or CHANGED vote.  The body of the
message must contain the vote, your full name, and net address.  Improperly
formatted votes will be returned to sender uncounted.  Posted votes do not
count.

Voting will be from Thursday October 19 until Thursday November 9, 1989.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

The name "rec.aquarium" was chosen for several reasons.  I feel that
distribution in "sci" would be inappropriate.  The justifications given
by Mr. Sexton are neither sufficient nor correct.  Quality "rec" groups
*are* distributed in Europe, including Holland.  Here is a quote from
Mr. Sexton's formal proposal:

>	Whats (sic) the difference ? It turns out that sci goes to Europe
>	and rec, for the most part, doesn't. (rec, for example
>	doesn't go to Germany and Holland).

A grab for better distribution is not reason for a new "sci" group.
The name "aquarium" is used for absolute clarity.  Artistic expression should
be used in the body of messages, not the name of group.

A rec.aquarium group probably makes sense even if a more technical aquarium
group is passed.  Please decide for yourself based on the wealth of opinions
expressed in news.groups.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------