[news.announce.newgroups] preliminary call for disussion: rec.arts.movies subgroups

rshapiro@BBN.COM (Richard Shapiro) (12/21/89)

As a movie lover who's found it necessary to unsubscribe to
rec.arts.movies, I'd like to gauge Net opinion about spinning off one
(or more) subgroups.  The problem with rec.arts.movies is well known,
I think: a *very* high count of articles, the great majority of which
are about a handful of movies which happen to be popular that week or
month. Using Kill files or typing N isn't even remotely a practical
solution -- other kinds of articles are thoroughly buried in the
avalanche of stuff about Batman or Back to the Future or whatever.
Most of the rest of the articles fall in the "list all the movies with
X" category. 

What this means is that those of us with a broader and perhaps
slightly more serious interest in the whole history of cinema are
unable to use this group AT ALL, and there's really no hope of that
situation ever changing. It seems clear to me that, if there is
interest in a different kind of forum for movie talk, we'll need a new
group to conduct it in. This pre-call-for-votes is an attempt to find
out if there is any such interest.

As one concrete proposal (but only one), let me suggest r.a.m.classic
which would be exclusively for the (serious) discussion of older
Hollywood movies (not necessarily "great" movies). This group would
have to be moderated, I think.

Is there any interest in such a group? How about a different subgroup?
I just want to have a usable forum for talking about cinema in a more
serious and more historical way than is possible on r.a.m. Any such
forum is better than none at all.

Opinions?