rodney@dali.ipl.rpi.edu (Rodney Peck II) (12/20/89)
Boy this is a stupid group. -- Rodney
darcy@druid.uucp (D'Arcy J.M. Cain) (12/21/89)
In article <RODNEY.89Dec19185419@dali.ipl.rpi.edu> rodney@dali.ipl.rpi.edu (Rodney Peck II) writes: > >Boy this is a stupid group. > >-- >Rodney Boy that is a stupid posting. -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain (darcy@druid) | Thank goodness we don't get all D'Arcy Cain Consulting | the government we pay for. West Hill, Ontario, Canada | No disclaimers. I agree with me |
nelson@sun.soe.clarkson.edu (Russ Nelson) (12/21/89)
In article <1989Dec20.160613.5353@druid.uucp> darcy@druid.uucp (D'Arcy J.M. Cain) writes: In article <RODNEY.89Dec19185419@dali.ipl.rpi.edu> rodney@dali.ipl.rpi.edu (Rodney Peck II) writes: > >Boy this is a stupid group. > >Rodney Boy that is a stupid posting. -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain (darcy@druid) Boy this is a stupid triplet of postings. Objoke: All numbers are prime: The Mathematician's proof: One is prime, two is prime, three is prime, they're all prime. The Scientist's proof: One is prime, two is prime, three is prime, four is experimental error, five is prime, they're all prime. The Engineer's proof: One is prime, two is prime, three is prime, four is prime, five is prime, they're all prime. -- --russ (nelson@clutx [.bitnet | .clarkson.edu]) Russ.Nelson@$315.268.6667 Live up to the light thou hast, and more will be granted thee. A recession now appears more than 2 years away -- John D. Mathon, 4 Oct 1989. I think killing is value-neutral in and of itself. -- Gary Strand, 8 Nov 1989. Liberals run this country, by and large. -- Clayton Cramer, 20 Nov 1989. Shut up and mind your Canadian business, you meddlesome foreigner. -- TK, 23 N.
tower@ai.mit.edu (Leonard H. Tower Jr.) (12/22/89)
Date: 21 Dec 89 14:20:55 GMT From: news@image.soe.clarkson.edu (Russ Nelson) Organization: Clarkson University, Potsdam NY In article <1989Dec20.160613.5353@druid.uucp> darcy@druid.uucp (D'Arcy J.M. Cain) writes: In article <RODNEY.89Dec19185419@dali.ipl.rpi.edu> rodney@dali.ipl.rpi.edu (Rodney Peck II) writes: Three postings/messages. All idle chatter. All very low signal. All unappropriate for this forum, and rude to the people who come here for discussion of GNU. Take it to alt.* or talk.*, it certainly doesn't belong on gnUSENET. Let's get back to substance. Anyone have somethign NEW to say or ask about? thanx -len GNU's mailing list and newsgroup architect.
pardo@CS.WASHINGTON.EDU (David Keppel) (12/22/89)
In article <8912211843.AA09405@wheat-chex> you write: >Take it to alt.* or talk.*, it certainly doesn't belong on gnUSENET. I already did -- alt.stupidity -- but I didn't want to clutter up gnu.misc.discuss by cross-posting it there! ;-D on ( And still I don't... ) Pardo -- pardo@cs.washington.edu {rutgers,cornell,ucsd,ubc-cs,tektronix}!uw-beaver!june!pardo