[gnu.misc.discuss] 64 bit architectures and C/C++

chip@tct.com (Chip Salzenberg) (05/09/91)

According to cadsi@ccad.uiowa.edu (CADSI):
>From article <2826D9E7.407F@tct.com>, by chip@tct.com (Chip Salzenberg):
>> G++ 1.39 ... is free, too.
>
>BUT, you're not supposed to make money on what you compile with G++,
>right?  I thought I read that before.

Wrong.  You can make money off a program compiled with G++.  In fact,
we have our very first C++ project in beta test right now, and it's
all compiled with G++.

The trick is that you can't distribute a program containing GNU code
(like the GNU C++ library "libg++") unless you also distribute source
code to the whole program linked therewith.  We avoid this problem by
avoiding libg++.

A new version of the GNU public license may soon make a special case
of libraries, by requiring distribution of library source code, but
not the source code of the program(s) linked with the library.

Stay tuned in gcc.announce and gnu.misc.discuss.
-- 
Brand X Industries Sentient and Semi-Sentient Being Resources Department:
        Because Sometimes, "Human" Just Isn't Good Enough [tm]
     Chip Salzenberg         <chip@tct.com>, <uunet!pdn!tct!chip>