phillip@bartal.UUCP (08/27/90)
In article <1990Aug11.203139.9372@scuzzy.mbx.sub.org> src@scuzzy.mbx.sub.org (Heiko Blume) writes: >peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) writes: > >>Is it *really* too much to ask that people include an Archive-name: entry >>in postings to alt.sources? It is such a little thing, and saves countless >>hours of poring through files with names like "30Jul90.17652". Just put, on >>the first line of the message: > >>Archive-name: wp2latex/Part01 Y'know, this is an interesting discussion, and I'm all in favor of an FAQ list, but what does this have to do with wp2latex? I assume that the original posting didn't have an archive name that made any intuitive connection to wp or latex. Well, there's those of us out here who don't have lots of time to read the news, so we just scan the subjects for things that look interesting. I am interested in wp and latex, so these articles catch my eye. to make a long story short....while you guys have been flaming each other about meaningful archive names, you seem to have forgotten about meaningful subject lines. Sorry for the intrusion, you may resume firing at will :-) Phillip -- Phillip M. Vogel, President | #include <standard_disclaimer.h> Bartal Design Group, Inc. Englewood, NJ | (201)567-1343 FAX:(201)568-2891 UUCP: pyrnj!bartal!phillip | Domain: phillip@bartal.crlabs.com