Love-Hounds-request@GAFFA.MIT.EDU (06/24/89)
Really-From: Richard Caley <rjc%edai.edinburgh.ac.uk@NSFNET-RELAY.AC.UK> >Really-From: ide!lofdahl@Sun.COM (Corey Lofdahl) >3) We let Kate decide. >I vote for alternative #3. Ditto. I don't give a damn for EMI's profits. I can't really get worked up about whether KT doesn't get a few quid in one of two ways. I can get worked up about MS Bush retaining control of what she ( no doubt wonderfully ) created. And the copyrite arguments are silly. She does not have to tell him to cease and desist - she can give one time rights ( as far as I know ) and that is that. This assumes she still has copyright on this stuff, maybe she hasn't and she is obliged to tell EMI who chase us. I don't know. I doubt if anyone here does. Once again. ************************ * LET THE LADY DECIDE! * ************************ It's hers. No one else has the right. Including EMI - no matter what sort of contraxct they have her in. ( ps has my money gotten there yet? Huh? has the customs swallowed it? )