jbn@wdl1.UUCP (05/15/84)
Some advice on IP/TCP networks: 1. Trailer encapsulation (a la 4.2BSD) is nonstandard. So is the use of IP datagrams in excess of 576 bytes. You are only entitled to use either if you have ``a priori information that the receiving host is able to accept them''. TOPS-20, for example, won't. 2. Ethernet address resolution protocol, (Plummer's) is becoming accepted as the means for finding Ethernet addresses from IP addresses. Undocumented, but increasingly common, is arranging for gateways on an Ethernet to answer address resolution polls for anything they can reach. This means that ARP is all the routing a host on the Ethernet needs. The case of two gateways on an Ethernet still presents problems. 3. There are no really satisfactory gateway implementations that one can buy. There are a number of university-developed gateways, but no products as yet. We are developing two, but they aren't available yet. 4. Comments on implementations: - 3COM's UNET was the first commercial implementation; it has been withdrawn from the market. We use a much-modified version of UNET on some of our systems. - COMPION's implementation for VMS is very slow, especially for TELNET. Compion isn't very interested in the business, as far as we can tell; we are an unhappy customer. - The Wollongong implementation for VMS is a port of the 4.2BSD one for UNIX. It appears to be about as good as the 4.2BSD, and better than Compion's, but we have not tested it ourselves. - DEC's TOPS-20 implementation is buggy and poorly supported. Plan on investing systems programming time. Contact Mark Crispin at Stanford (MRC@SCORE) for details and fixes. - 4.2BSD's implementation is fair; there are known bugs in retransmit timing and mixed-speed nets have problems with gateway congestion. - SUN has the standard 4.2BSD bugs. - Apollo seems to have done a nice job; we tested UTAH-APOLLO and didn't find anything wrong, a statement we seldom make. - Perkin-Elmer still uses UNET. - Communications Machinery and Excelan have boards which support Ethernet, IP, and TCP. We haven't tested these yet. - Network Research Corporation offers a version of Fusion, their networking package, which uses IP/TCP. This is presently available for some M68000 machines, and is supposedly becoming available for the IBM PC and its clones.
mats@dual.UUCP (Mats Wichmann) (05/17/84)
My understanding is that Network Research's Fusion product is XNS based. They are now advertising TCP/IP as well - I don't know if this has supplanted the XNS or supplemented it. Does someone know? Mats Wichmann Dual Systems Corp. ...{ucbvax,amd70,ihnp4,cbosgd,decwrl,fortune}!dual!mats
joe@fluke.UUCP (05/18/84)
Actually, Compion was recently bought out by Gould, and Gould has "given" the support of the ACCESS software to FlexComm Corp. in Seattle. We just installed V1.8 of ACCESS-I here and although I agree with the comments about speed, it did come up quite easily and fit right into our corporate Ethernet (mainly VAXen and SUNs running 4.2) with no problems at all. One side effect of the shift from Compion to FlexComm is that the FlexComm people are VERY interested in improving the speed of the system. I feel very confident that furture releases of ACCESS from FlexComm will really clean up the implementation and result in a much better product. The address of FlexComm for those interested is: FlexComm Corporation 15245 Pacific Highway South Seattle, WA 98188 (206)243-1641 Maybe I am getting better service since I am a local customer, but I get the impression from talking to them that they would give anyone the same attention long-distance. /Joe