ed@DAS.LLNL.GOV (Edward Suranyi) (12/14/89)
I DO NOT list the number of times I hear Kate on the radio -- at
least I haven't for many months. I did at the beginning, when it was so
rare. But now, I hear Kate at least once a day, and several times
on many days. It would be ridiculous for me to post that every day.
When the album is actually featured on a particular day (which will
not happen any more) I like to put what was played in the record.
However, I think it might be informative to see how high she is on
their playlist, as an example of how Kate is doing on alternative
radio generally. I for one am interested in other reports around
the country.
Also, I sometimes quote the DJ's when they talk about Kate. I love
to hear people talk about her (in a positive way, of course), so
I assume other people do too.
I've been posting a lot of reviews and things lately, too. I've gotten
lots of encouragement from people to keep this up, so I will certainly
continue. When I don't post a review, but simply mention its existence,
|>oug always asks me to send him a copy for his archives. If I have to
type it in for him, I may as well send it to all of Love-Hounds, since
I'm sure some people are interested.
The main thing I want to say, though, is that for heaven's sake, if
you're not interested in an article, JUST SKIP TO THE NEXT ONE! I
will not be hurt.
Ed (Edward Suranyi) | Caption: "Kate Bush goes from cult fave to
Dept. of Applied Science | chart rave." -- _Billboard_
UC Davis/Livermore | (In "Was It A Hit Or A Miss" in the 1985
ed@das.llnl.gov | year-end special issue.)
steve@halley.UUCP (Steve Williams) (12/14/89)
ed@DAS.LLNL.GOV (Edward Suranyi) writes: > >However, I think it might be informative to see how high she is on >their playlist, as an example of how Kate is doing on alternative >radio generally. I for one am interested in other reports around >the country. >...<text deleted> >I've been posting a lot of reviews and things lately, too. I've gotten >lots of encouragement from people to keep this up, so I will certainly >continue. >...<text deleted> >The main thing I want to say, though, is that for heaven's sake, if >you're not interested in an article, JUST SKIP TO THE NEXT ONE! I >will not be hurt. I think most Love-Hounds do appreciate all your information, even (in a general sense) the mentions of playtimes and DJ banter. But I've been wondering for some time if you might compile the lesser articles into a daily (or twice-weekly or something) summary, much like IED's digests. Call it the SuranyiSummary or The Big S Report or something. Just a suggestion, Ed. Things like interview transcriptions should still be posted separately, of course. (Thanks for all those!) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Steve Williams ...!cs.utexas.edu!halley!steve Tandem Computers (512)-244-8252 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------