Love-Hounds-request@GAFFA.MIT.EDU (07/28/90)
Really-From: ed@das.llnl.gov (Edward Suranyi) Normally I would do this by e-mail, but you publically said I was wrong. I have received confirmation from people as widely scattered as Andreas in Sweden, Woj, and Vickie that articles that appeared in the Love-hounds digest did not appear in .gaffa. Andreas counted 14 such articles just in the digest received July 25. However, it seems to be working now. There have been no articles missing from .gaffa for the past two days. Ed ed@das.llnl.gov
Love-Hounds-request@GAFFA.MIT.EDU (07/28/90)
Really-From: Doug Alan <nessus@mit.edu> > From: ed@das.llnl.gov (Edward Suranyi) > Normally I would do this by e-mail, but you publically said I was > wrong. I have received confirmation from people as widely > scattered as Andreas in Sweden, Woj, and Vickie that articles that > appeared in the Love-hounds digest did not appear in .gaffa. Andreas > counted 14 such articles just in the digest received July 25. > > However, it seems to be working now. There have been no articles > missing from .gaffa for the past two days. I didn't say that the problem is at your end. I just said that it's not at my end. All of the articles *are* making it to rec.music.gaffa. Now why rec.music.gaffa isn't propogating properly to you and others I can't say because I have no control over the computers between you and me. If someone wants to inquire about loss of good Usenet coverage for rec.music.gaffa, there are newsgroups with knowledgable people in them who keep track of this sort of thing. Maybe some major backbone site is throwing rec.music.gaffa articles away. If someone has the time to research this, I am sure everyone would appreciate it. |>oug