smy@RUFSUN2.FFM.FGAN.DE (Hardy Smyczek) (01/23/91)
Can anybody tell me if PP will be included in the next
ISODE package ?
Thanks
Hardyj.onions@xtel.co.uk (Julian Onions) (01/23/91)
Yes, I can tell you. It won't be. The decision has been taken to release PP separately from ISODE. It should in general be available a short time after each major ISODE release. Julian.
doelz@urz.unibas.ch (01/24/91)
In article <13160.664619053@xtel.co.uk>, j.onions@xtel.co.uk (Julian Onions) writes: > Yes, I can tell you. It won't be. The decision has been taken to release > PP separately from ISODE. It should in general be available a short time > after each major ISODE release. > Does this mean that you can implement PP without ISODE ? Regards Reinhard
kremer@cs.utwente.nl (Harro Kremer) (01/25/91)
In article <1991Jan23.182830.1323@urz.unibas.ch>, doelz@urz.unibas.ch writes: |> In article <13160.664619053@xtel.co.uk>, j.onions@xtel.co.uk (Julian Onions) writes: |> > Yes, I can tell you. It won't be. The decision has been taken to release |> > PP separately from ISODE. It should in general be available a short time |> > after each major ISODE release. |> > |> |> Does this mean that you can implement PP without ISODE ? |> Since PP is released after ISODE , the question should be: Do you need PP for every implementation of ISODE ? Harro +----------------------------------------------------------+ | Harro Kremer | | Dept. of Computer Science | | University of Twente | | P.O. Box 217 Email: kremer@cs.utwente.nl | | 7500 AE Enschede voice: +31 53 89 3755 | | Netherlands fax : +31 53 33 3815 | +----------------------------------------------------------+
j.onions@xtel.co.uk (Julian Onions) (01/28/91)
No - PP requires ISODE, but the effort involved in putting together a relase of ISODE or PP is non-trivial. As many of the same people are involved in both it takes that much longer. Having them separate is therefore likely to make both of them more solid. Julian.