kjr@etn.UUCP (Kjetil Rossavik 1229) (01/29/91)
Hi, Does anybody have any experience with communication between Isode and Retix protocol stacks. Is it possible at all? Which lower layer configurations do they have in common? Regards, Kjetil Rossavik.
old@sunbim.be (Olivier Dubois) (01/29/91)
Hi, I did a lot of FTAM testing between Isode and a RETIX stack ported by NCR to its tower range of machine. After the first problems to set well the addresses, I found some bugs in the RETIX stack and in Isode, mainly at the application level (a small correction was neccesary at the NCR transport layer to support the long addresses generated by the transport bridge), but generally it work quite well. We worked with TP0 over public X.25, between Belgium and Luxembourg, I don't have chances to test with TP4 (LAN..) as the NCR FTAM do not support TP4 and I don't know if RETIX support somehow RFC 1006. If both stack are well installed, the only problem you have is to set up the various addresses. I hope it help... Olivier Dubois.
jh@tut.fi (Juha Heinanen) (01/31/91)
we have been running retix x.400 against isode pp over the tp4/clnp stack. -- -- Juha Heinanen, FUNET, Finland, jh@funet.fi, +358 49 500958