[soc.feminism] Titles for the Arts and Letters

throop@cs.utexas.EDU (David Throop) (09/07/89)

[Sorry about the delay in posting this -- I had some trouble with
my mailer.]

News flash: Knight-Ridder reports "Ms." to be an incorrect form of
address, used by the lazy!

"Crane's Blue Book of Stationery: The Styles and Etiquette of Letters
Notes and Invitations," (referred to as "the Bible" for printers of
wedding announcements) bans the use of Ms. entirely.  The lastest
edition of Emily Post suggests finds it "unattractive."  The article
says that, among the etiquette doyens "There is a strong suggestion
that Ms survives because of laziness: It is used when you don't want
to bother to find out what the woman so addressed wants." [The idea
that the woman would WANT to be address as Ms. is not discussed.]

Since "Crane's" is geared to the wedding industry, it may have a
commercial interest in suggesting that all women should want to be
known by their marital status.

Books by Charlotte Ford and Judith Martin find Ms. as acceptable, as
it reflects current usage.
	
******

I occasionally attend formal cultural events - opera, symphony, etc,
- at the Bass Hall at University of Texas.  Two pages of the program
go to thanking the financial supporters -- usually about two hundred
lines of type, with one donor or donor-couple per line.  The listings
break down to about
   > 35% as "Mr. and Mrs. Phillip Anthropoid" (or Dr. and Mrs...) form.
   > 5-10% as "Mrs. George Stationary" (widows, or maybe the husband
dislikes opera.) (or maybe her first name *is* George.)
   >  5% as "Mr Willop Beebob"
   > 20% as "George and Betty Thunderbrick"
   > 10% from people listed singly, with no title.
   > a smattering (< 5%) of "Miss", and "Ms" 
   > a lesser smattering of couples with different last names.
    ("Billy Swizzle and Julia Stick")
   > 5% singles using other titles ("Dr", "Hon.", "Rev.", "Col.")
   > the balance in anonymous, corporate, miscellaneous, and unclassifiable. 

Most of the listings use some form of title.

One of the interesting sidelights to this is who *doesn't* use a
title.  Listed in the same program are the names of the UT faculty
that have helped make the whole thing possible.  These are all
professors.  However, these are always listed without any title, (tho
they are all, presumably "Dr.")

David Throop, ABD