[soc.feminism] Name Change Upon Marriage?

kgf2173@uunet.uu.net (Kerry G. Forschler) (08/15/90)

I'm interested in women's opinions about changing names when they
are married.  

In this last month I've spent 10 to 20 hours updating and
correcting our church's directory of members.  I was trying to get
up to date addresses and track down some inactive members who had
moved out of the area.  Some of this time, but by no means all,
was spent dealing with church members who had gotten married and
changed their names.  Of course, I could not get AT&T directory
service information under their previous names and I frequently
had trouble finding their new names.  I found it very frustrating.

How do you women feel about changing your name when you're married?

What sort of frustrations has it caused you? 

It seems to me (a male) that changing your name shows belonging/
/allegiance/ownership/subservience/possession/etc (you pick the
word) to your husband.  How do you see it?

BTW, yes, I'm married.  Almost 20 years ago, my wife changed her
name to mine.  We've talked about this several times and she
says she probably wouldn't do it again.  For some of those 20 years,
I've thought that I might have changed my name to be hyphenated
with hers, if I'd been more liberated at the time.  But when I see
the frustrations it causes, I beginning to think that it might be
an out of date custom.

What do you think?

-- 
Kerry G. Forschler   		 |  Voice: 206-237-1274 (work)
Boeing Commercial Airplanes      |  Voice: 206-235-1435 (home)
P.O. Box 3707, M/S 96-02         |  UUCP: ..!uunet!bcstec!tahoma!kgf2173
Seattle, WA  98124-2207          |  Boeing net: kgf2173@tahoma

twain@blake.acs.washington.edu (Barbara Hlavin) (08/17/90)

In article <1157@tahoma.UUCP> bcstec!tahoma!kgf2173@uunet.uu.net (Kerry G. Forschler) writes:
>I'm interested in women's opinions about changing names when they
>are married.  
>[...]
>It seems to me (a male) that changing your name shows belonging/
>/allegiance/ownership/subservience/possession/etc (you pick the
>word) to your husband.  How do you see it?

I did not change my name when I married, nor would I change it if 
I married again.  I identify very strongly with my name; in some sense
it seems to represent who I am:  I AM Barbara Hlavin.  I don't know who
Barbara Somebodyelse is.  And as a writer I find names and naming very 
powerful stuff.  

I also find the practice objectionable for all the (good) reasons you 
list above.

A related anecdote:  I married in 1980, and the following year we filed
a joint income tax form.  For various reasons our taxes were complicated
that first year, so we went to H&R Block.  The CPA who did our return
was very hostile to me; apparently he disapproved of the fact that I 
had not taken my husband's name, and he filled out the form listing 
me, incorrectly, as Barbara [former husband's last name].  I pointed
out that this was wrong.  He refused to look at me and didn't answer 
me.  I said, "Look:  there is no such person as Barbara [blank].  There
is no such legal entity with that Social Security number."

He lifted his head, fixed me with a glare of loathing, and snarled, 
"IT DOESN'T MATTER."

"CHANGE THE NAME," said my husband, and the Q-tip did.  I couldn't help
but feel he was making the point that he was not about to do what a 
WOMAN told him to do.

--Barbara

--
Barbara Hlavin				Oh I am a cat that likes to
twain@blake.acs.washington.edu		Gallop about doing good.
U. Washington AI-10/Seattle 98195	-Stevie Smith, The Galloping Cat

vicki@mathcs.emory.edu (Vicki Powers) (08/17/90)

In article <1157@tahoma.UUCP>, bcstec!tahoma!kgf2173@uunet.uu.net (Kerry G. Forschler) writes:
> I'm interested in women's opinions about changing names when they
> are married.  
> 
I did not change my name when I married.  My name is part of me, I can't
imagine changing it (nor could my husband - he would have protested if
I had wanted to change my name).  I haven't had too many problems - we
did have trouble filing joint tax returns until this year.  Finally this 
year they changed the forms to allow different last names.

By the way, our daughter (who is 3 weeks old today!) has my last name.  We
couldn't decide which name to use, finally we decided (in the middle of labor)
that a girl would get my name and a boy his name.  This has certainly raised
eyebrows, especially among my husband's relatives. 

  Vicki

-- 
Vicki  Powers       |  vicki@mathcs.emory.edu       	    PREFERRED
Emory University    |  {sun!sunatl,gatech}!emory!vicki      UUCP
Dept of Math and CS |  vicki@emory                          NON-DOMAIN BITNET
Atlanta, GA 30322   |  

huxtable@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu (Kathryn Huxtable) (08/17/90)

In article <1157@tahoma.UUCP>, bcstec!tahoma!kgf2173@uunet.uu.net (Kerry G. Forschler) writes:
> I'm interested in women's opinions about changing names when they
> are married.  
> ...
> How do you women feel about changing your name when you're married?
> ...
> What sort of frustrations has it caused you? 
> 
> It seems to me (a male) that changing your name shows belonging/
> /allegiance/ownership/subservience/possession/etc (you pick the
> word) to your husband.  How do you see it?
> ...
> What do you think?

I think that in today's society, the only concievable reason for a
couple to change their names when they marry is to identify the couple
as a family unit.

This can probably be done in other (less obvious) ways.  I don't like
the custom, myself.  For me, it buys into to much of the traditional
Christian(-like) heterosexual patriarchal attitudes to sit well with
me.

-- 
Kathryn Huxtable
huxtable@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu

bthomas@Neon.Stanford.EDU (Becky Thomas) (08/18/90)

In article <1157@tahoma.UUCP> bcstec!tahoma!kgf2173@uunet.uu.net (Kerry G. Forschler) writes:
>I'm interested in women's opinions about changing names when they
>are married.

I just got married a month ago, and decided to keep my name.
There were several reasons:

	- I'm working on a PhD in computer science, and have had a
	  journal article accepted under my birth name, so changing it
	  now would mean I wouldn't get credited with that article;
	  nobody would know that was me!  I've also begun to get a
	  tiny bit of name recognition among a very small set of
	  AI researchers, and I don't want to start over.

	- I do think I would be giving up a part of me if I adopted
	  someone else's name.  Friends have pointed out that I'm still
	  taking a man's name - it's just my father's instead of my
	  husband's.  But I have lived with that name all my life,
	  so it's *my* name, which was handed down from my father.
	  (My husband and I have decided to give our daughter(s) my
	  last name and our son(s) his, so that both get carried on.)

	- As Kerry points out, changing one's name makes it hard for
	  people to find you.

	- Plus, changing your name means going around changing all
	  kinds of documents - driver's license, social security card,
	  credit cards, bank accounts, school records.  I *hate*
	  doing paperwork, so this alone would probably have been
	  enough reason to keep my name.

What are the drawbacks?  At our wedding reception, I didn't have the
"fun" of hearing people use a new name for me - I know some people
who really find this to be exciting and fun, and I can understand
that.  Also, there's the annoyance of having to explain that yes, we
really are married, and no, I'm not Mrs. Van Norden and no, he's not
Mr. Thomas.  (When our wedding announcement appeared in my hometown
newspaper, the caption under the picture said "Becky and Bryan Van
Norden," even though I explicitly asked for the caption "Becky Thomas
and Bryan Van Norden."  Sigh.)  And then there's figuring out which name
to give to children.

While I think the tradition of the woman changing her name is
*in itself* fairly harmless, I don't like the historical significance.
The tradition of the wife submerging her identity and taking on the
new identity of "wife of So-and-so" is disturbing to me, and is
(IMO) outmoded.  But in the end this is a personal decision, and I
think each person should make it in terms of his or her own opinions
and values.

Becky Thomas
bthomas@cs.stanford.edu


>--
>Kerry G. Forschler   		 |  Voice: 206-237-1274 (work)
>Boeing Commercial Airplanes      |  Voice: 206-235-1435 (home)
>P.O. Box 3707, M/S 96-02         |  UUCP: ..!uunet!bcstec!tahoma!kgf2173
>Seattle, WA  98124-2207          |  Boeing net: kgf2173@tahoma


--
--

Becky Thomas
bthomas@cs.stanford.edu

jcarson@cs.washington.edu (Janet Carson) (08/19/90)

In article <1157@tahoma.UUCP> bcstec!tahoma!kgf2173@uunet.uu.net (Kerry G. Forschler) writes:
>I'm interested in women's opinions about changing names when they
>are married.

I changed my name when I got married, mainly because changing my
name was more important to my husband than not changing my name was
to me.  (I didn't want to change my name for reasons similar to those 
presented by other posters.)  I didn't like changing my name: either the
bureaucratic hassles or the emotional feelings associated with 
"abandoning" my maiden name.  (A lot of those feelings surprised me!)

Getting married wasn't the first time my name changed.  When I was a 
kid, my parents had the family last name legally changed from Czyzewicz 
to Chess, for convenience more than anything.  (Some of the other Czyzewiczes 
in the extended family had also become Chesses, I believe around the same
time.)  I don't remember this clearly; I don't even think I could spell
Czyzewicz at the time, but I do remember feeling uneasy about it.
I knew my name, and it was scary to think that it could just *change* all 
of a sudden.  I remember my mom saying something like, "If you really don't 
like it, you can be Janet Czyzewicz, and all of the rest of us will 
be Chesses."  To which I promptly responded "NO!"

What is valuable about a name is not the name itself, it's who you share
it with.  

Since I've gotten married and changed my name, I've found that 
I am much more neurotic about using my middle name or middle initial, 
perhaps because my middle name (Lynn) is shared by all of my sisters.  
It's a name that connects me to something.

When a couple gets married, they can have separate last names.  If they
decide to have children, they can give the children different last
names as well.  But I have to wonder, once the practice of multiple-named 
families becomes common, will those names be worth keeping? If the only 
other Chesses I had known were my mom and a couple of obscure cousins, would 
it have been such a big deal to become a Carson?  If my name hadn't been a 
part of something bigger, it wouldn't have been so difficult to let it go.  
It wouldn't have had the same meaning.

It's not the *name* itself that is worth preserving, it's the *meaning* 
of the name, the connections the name provides.   A name a daughter 
can share with her parents, siblings and extended family is a special 
gift that parents are free to give or not to give.  The daughter might 
not even appreciate the value of such a gift until she has to consider 
giving it up.

My opinions on name changing and child naming are not cut and dry.  I
don't like the historical reasoning behind a woman taking the man's
last name.  I don't like the bureacratic or emotional problems 
associated with changing a name.  I don't think it's fair that the only
way to pass on the family name under the traditional naming system is
to have a son.  But I have reservations about alternative naming systems 
that take away the most wonderful part of names -- the joy of sharing
them with others.
-- 
Janet L. Carson
jcarson@june.cs.washington.edu

leesa@frith.egr.msu.EDU (Anita Lees) (08/20/90)

In article <1157@tahoma.UUCP> bcstec!tahoma!kgf2173@uunet.uu.net (Kerry G. Forschler) writes:
>I'm interested in women's opinions about changing names when they
>are married.
>
 [stuff deleted]
>
>How do you women feel about changing your name when you're married?
>
I didn't care that much for my "maiden" name, 'Follis'.  I liked my
husband's name, 'Lees'.  I welcomed the opportunity to get a nicer name.
I didn't think it was any worse taking my spouse's last name than to
wear my father's name.

>What sort of frustrations has it caused you?
>
None, really.  I had to change my name at the registrar's office at UM,
and for a brief time there were 3 of me at two addresses :-), but that
was minor.

>It seems to me (a male) that changing your name shows belonging/
>/allegiance/ownership/subservience/possession/etc (you pick the
>word) to your husband.  How do you see it?
>
Yes, but as I stated above, I didn't prefer my father's name.  For me,
"allegiance" is the description I choose.  I don't like the word
"husband", BTW.  It originally meant that he took you in as chattel,
like the cows and chickens.  Spouse is nicer, and gender neutral.

>BTW, yes, I'm married.  Almost 20 years ago, my wife changed her
>name to mine.  We've talked about this several times and she
>says she probably wouldn't do it again.  For some of those 20 years,
>I've thought that I might have changed my name to be hyphenated
>with hers, if I'd been more liberated at the time.  But when I see
>the frustrations it causes, I beginning to think that it might be
>an out of date custom.
>
I got married 10 years ago.  I considered hyphenation, but decided to
make my "maiden" name into my new middle name instead: thus,

	Anita Jean Follis ---> Anita Follis Lees.

All I had to do was present my marriage license to the Secretary of
State, and (I think) testify or sign that I had no fraudulent intent.

I saw an article (forgot where) that if the couple hyphenated their
names, with the womyn's first, then the children could keep the male and
female name lines going when they married.  For example,

		Mary Smith    +    Joe Jones
   -->		Mary Smith-Jones   Joe Smith-Jones
		       		\  /
    Larry Steel + Ann Smith-Jones    Jim Smith-Jones  + Jan Baker
--> Larry & Ann Smith-Steel          Jim & Jan Baker-Jones

Well, this is nifty... but a real headache at the family reunions! :-)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anita Follis Lees                              leesa@frith.msu.egr.edu
================= no one else would WANT my opinions =================

hars@pws.bull.com (Adele Hars) (08/21/90)

I'm also a writer, and also kept my name when I married, and also had trouble
with the IRS about it.  But I would absolutely do it again and recommend it
to anyone interested in perserving their identity after marriage.

A few observations:

1. If you plan to keep your name, tell your husband-to-be very gently, and be
prepared to stick to your guns.  Many men seem to put a very high value on
Mrs. John Smith, and are hurt when the wife-to-be objects.  Eventually, though,
he'll understand (assuming you're going into a good marriage).

2. If it makes him feel better, make dinner reservations in his name.

3. Be aware that older relatives may not accept it 

4. Be prepared to explain your name is X and his name is Y to everyone 
from the Sears repair person to people at cocktail parties

A question -- what do you name your kids?  I favor hypenation, but in a few
generations, that could get a little long...  any thoughts?  Maybe they'll
just work it out.

	- Adele Hars

maz@ihlpl.att.com (Mary Ann Zeszutko) (08/21/90)

In article <1157@tahoma.UUCP> bcstec!tahoma!kgf2173@uunet.uu.net (Kerry G. Forschler) writes:
>How do you women feel about changing your name when you're married?

We married June 23, and my name is still the same one I've had all
my life.  I don't get bent out of shape if I'm called "Mrs. Kenny",
but I do tell folks that's not my name.

>What sort of frustrations has it caused you? 

None, so far.  We're moving, and the new lease is in both names.
We're moving out of state, though, and my driver's license and
library card and all of that may be problematic when we go to get
the new ones;  I'm hoping we won't be hassled.

I would have been open to changing to a new name altogether, but
my husband complained that his work wouldn't be recognized as his
if he changed his name.  I told him I had already figured that out.

For social situations, I could go by the societally-expected default,
but my _name_ remains the same.  
-- 
aMAZon @ AT&T Bell Labs Naperville IL; att!ihlpl!maz  maz@ihlpl.att.com
*It's never too late to have a happy childhood* (708) 979-5749
*When I grow up, I want to be a radfem*   *Lottery winner 623*

judyd%wizard.cna.tek.com@RELAY.CS.NET (Judy E. Drake) (08/22/90)

In article <1157@tahoma.UUCP> bcstec!tahoma!kgf2173@uunet.uu.net (Kerry G. Forschler) writes:
>How do you women feel about changing your name when you're married?

I didn't change my name when I got married, four years ago, for all
the reasons that have been discussed in this thread.  My husband
preferred that I keep my own name as well.

However, I _did_ feel that I had the choice.  If I had liked his
name better than mine, I might have changed my name.  His name is
Hill.  If my name had been Butz, or Pigg, or Zwartverwer, I
might have welcomed a chance to change it to Hill.  (Of course, 
he also could change his name to mine, if he wanted.)

>What sort of frustrations has it caused you? 

None.  We own two cars together, we've bought two houses, 
we have a child, we own a business together, we have joint
credit cards and bank accounts, and we pay taxes together.  
We've never had the slightest problem with having 
different names.  It seems to me that so many combinations
of people can have joint possessions and finances that all
these bureaucracies are set up to deal with affiliations
between people who have different last names.  It's really a 
trivial issue.  Whenever we've applied for a mortgage or 
bought a car, or had our child, the people doing the paperwork 
never have asked or appeared to care whether we were married.  

There have been some small frustrations for me, when individuals
or organizations assume that my husband is "the head of the
household."  (What an antiquated idea!)  But I think those
frustrations would have occurred whether or not I had changed
my name.

I get called "Mrs. Hill" once in a while, but not very often.
People usually don't persist in calling me that after I ask to
be called "Judy."  A few times, I've had to explain that I'm
married but have a different last name than my husband.  It's
never fazed anyone.

Judy Drake

charles@zip.eecs.umich.edu (Charles Jacob Cohen) (08/24/90)

A while ago a former girlfriend of mine told me that she wanted to
keep her last name after marriage (no, we didn't break up over that!
long story, and we are still in touch!).  At first this idea depressed
the heck out of me, and it still gives me twinges, but she was right.
With a career, she really *couldn't* change her name, because that is
how people will know her.  Also, if I wouldn't want to change my name
to her last name, why should she?  Then I got to thinking about the
confusion.  What if at a luncheon engagement with her collegues, they
called me Mr. HerLastName, what would I do?  I decided that I would
politely correct them by saying (and hopefully it would have been true
by that time!), "I'm sorry, but that should be Dr. HerLastName."

    - Chuck ,     charles@sparky.eecs.umich.edu

draughn@iitmax.iit.EDU (Mark Draughn) (08/24/90)

In article <15382@know.pws.bull.com> hars@pws.bull.com (Adele Hars) writes:
>A few observations:
[...]
>2. If it makes him feel better, make dinner reservations in his name.

Since my wife-to-be and I both have names that are tricky to spell
and/or pronounce, we have been making reservations for years using the
name "Gibson."  It's only a restaurant, and I'm tired of having to
spell my name to people over and over and over...

In fact, we've been joking about changing both our names to something
easier to spell.  Or maybe to something more prestigious like
Rockefeller or Vanderbilt.

[...]
>4. Be prepared to explain your name is X and his name is Y to everyone
>from the Sears repair person to people at cocktail parties

Yeah.  My fiance isn't planning to change her name (I think mostly
because of all the paperwork: bank accounts, school records, credit
cards...) and we know we're going to run into this.  I don't get upset
when people call me Mister Dougherty, so I don't suppose she gets
upset when people call her Mrs Draughn.  But maybe, as with having to
spell our names to people, it will begin to get on our nerves after
the first 1000 times it happens.

>A question -- what do you name your kids?  I favor hypenation, but in a few
>generations, that could get a little long...  any thoughts?  Maybe they'll
>just work it out.

If we have kids, maybe we'll let them have the easy-to-spell name...
--

Mark Draughn    | <draughn@iitmax.iit.edu> or <SYSMARK@IITVAX> on BITNET
----------------+ Academic Computing Center, Illinois Institute of Technology
+1 312 567 5962 | 10 W. 31st Street, Chicago, Illinois  60616

regard@hpsdde.hp.COM (Adrienne Regard) (08/24/90)

I've been in and out of the name change business for some time, so I'll
share my experiences with you.

I had a perfectly horrid name when I was a kid.  Compounded by the
fact that all my sisters had lovely lilting Welsh names.  Compounded
by the teasing I endured for years by rhymes made out of my name.

At 16, we moved from the small town I was raised in, and I
incorporated my "confirmation name" (taken at 13, for the purpose of
making a change later on) into my drivers license name - first name,
confirmation name, last name.  Then I signed it first initial,
confirmation name, last name.  That became my legal identity in the
new town.

A few years later, I got married.  I was an actor at the time, and had
been dissatisfied with my 'own' last name, and had been considering
changing it anyhow, so I used the opportunity of the marriage to take
my husband's last name (much nicer than my own, for the purposes of
memory recall).  It's terrifically *easy* to get your name changed on
all important documents just by saying "I got married".  Nobody asks
for corroboration.  You could get married to a Morris, and change your
name to Smith on a whim, just by telling folks "I got married".  At
least, that's what I found.  In fact, there were places who changed my
name *for* me, even against my wishes, upon marriage.  I wanted all my
school records to be in my original name just for the sake of easy
access, and yet the school went ahead and altered my records to the
'new' name.  Took me a fight to get them changed back.

Then I had a child, and then I got a divorce.  The child's name was
easy, since we were all Regards anyhow, so was she.  When I divorced,
I was still acting, and didn't want to change my name back to the
non-memorable one, so I kept Regard, as did my daughter.

Later, when I joined forces with Jon Purdy, and he adopted my
daughter, the social services worker wanted my daughter to change her
name from Regard to Purdy "as a symbol of building the bridge between
her and her new father, rather than her old father".  I had to point
out to her (numerous times) that Regard was my DAUGHTER's name, not
her father's property.  It was also MY name, not her father's
property.  If my daughter wanted to keep it, the decision was entirely
up to her.  She kept it, to the chagrin of the social worker.  I don't
think the 'bridge' between my daughter and Jon was at all damaged in
the process.

Later, when Jon and I had a second daughter, she was named "Purdy",
after him.  In part to 'balance' out the family, in part because Jon
was not comfortable passing Regard on to his offspring, since he does
still associate the name with my ex.  Frankly, I think that's silly,
for the reasoning above, but I also respect my lover's wishes, and he
was due to pick the name since the Purdy's were outnumbered.

The scheme I like best has zip to do with my own experience, since
mine evolved over time with a whole bunch of zigs and zags along the
way, but I really *love* the idea of Joe Blow and Mary Smith becoming
Joe and Mary Hayride, and all their children would be Suzy, Bobby and
Kim Hayride, too.  The last name would be a name chosen by the couple
as their own commitment to family-hood -- the very start of their own
new union.

I can think of about 15 zillion good reasons *not* to change one's
name upon marriage (I can also think of about 18 zillion reasons why
*not* to get married) and about 8 good reasons *to* change one's name.
Depends a little on which situation one finds oneself in.

Adrienne Regard

sherri@ogicse.ogi.edu (Sherri Shulman) (08/24/90)

I've never had any substantial problems with keeping my name, but the
trivial problems are frequent. They are not usually of the form of
explaining to repairpeople/salespeople/etc. that we have two different
names but REALLY are married. They are usually bookkeeping problems:
book the car in for repair in one name, call for it using the other.
Medial records suddenly appearing in the wrong name. Reminding
schools/daycare arrangements about using your name instead of child's
last name....

Even aften 10 years, I still haven't come up with a reliable way to
manage this so that I don't confront it regualarly. BUT, I don't care very
much either. And no one else seems to.

sherri

gall@nexus.yorku.ca (Norm Gall) (08/28/90)

hars@pws.bull.com (Adele Hars) writes:

| A question -- what do you name your kids?  I favor hypenation, but in a few
| generations, that could get a little long...  any thoughts?  Maybe they'll
| just work it out.

My wife and I have decided to use the Icelandic tradition of changing
the last names of the children.  My name is Norman Gall and my Wife's
is Andrea McIntosh.  Our male children will have the last name
Normansen (son of Norman) and our female children will have the last
name Andreadottir (daughter of Andrea).  This defeats easy
identification of family (but most Western family names are
unnecessarily male oriented anyway), but does provide identification
with the gender of the child.  Icelanders (at least those
that lived in New Iceland in Manitoba) didn't change their last names
upon marriage anyway.


Norm Gall
--
"It is not the task of philosophy to affirm or deny the existence of
things, but rather to clarify what assertions or denials of existence
signify, if anything."                                  -- PMS Hacker

ag1v+@andrew.cmu.edu (Andrea B. Gansley-Ortiz) (08/29/90)

I don't believe in a woman changing her name to her husband's for the sake of
tradition.

One couple I know did hyphenate their names and both use both names.  My
roommate had decided early on that whichever name was easier to spell was
the name she would use.  She is choosing her fiance's name.

I won't choose my husband's name because I feel that I (note the 1st p. s.)
would loose part of my identity as an individual and feel more like his
property.  I have worked long and hard for individuals to say my last name
in it's entirety.  Gansley-Ortiz is not that difficult to say, especially
when you've had a chance to look at how it's spelled.  Yet people still try
to call me 'Ortiz' or 'Gansley', neither of which are my last name.  I love
my last name and I wouldn't give it up for the world.

Let me also say that that's how I feel now and if 'Mr. Wonderful' so completely
sweeps me off my feet, that there is a possibility that my feelings might
change.  A slight possibility.

Another reason I don't advocate name changes is that it is harder to find a
married woman if she changes her name.  Also, if you are in the professional
world, a lot of the work you did before you were married goes unnoticed, (not
out of malice but) because people don't know that it's the same person's work
they're reading or talking about.  If you received any of your degrees in your
maiden name, it is much easier to keep that name, then to go through the
unnecessary hassle of having to point out your accomplishments to people
who don't know your maiden name and are likely to forget it because it is
not your name now.

My Quarter's worth

ag