[soc.feminism] Feminism:separate but equal?

morphy@truebalt.cco.caltech.EDU (Jones Maxime Murphy) (10/20/90)

A moderator on this group, Miriam Nadel rejected a post of mine with
the comment that "race issues are only of marginal interest to
soc.feminism". I have often heard black women complain that the
feminist movement is insenstive to their concerns.

Is feminism simply a tool for bringing about parity between men and
women, while preserving racial inequality? In other words, is the
program simply to level the discrimination against white women,
leaving blacks behind? I'm particalarly interested in comments from
black women on this issue.

[Race issues with respect to feminism are appropriate; I did not see
the rejected article & so will not comment on its rejection.  This is
a subject, however, like feminism & abortion or feminism & religion,
that easily spins out of the domain of feminism because the second
issue is a large concern in its own right.  --CLT]

Jones
Physics Department
California Institute of Technology

larryc@poe.jpl.nasa.gov (Larry Carroll) (10/20/90)

One thing that I and many others have noticed and commented on about feminist
activists: most of us are white.  Even in LA, which has a large black, Latin,
& Oriental population, during my most recent period as a feminist activist
(mid-88 - end-89) there were very few non-white activist in our LA chapter of
NOW.  Part of this I think was due to racism (on the part of the whites who
are in AND those non-whites who were out of the organization).

However, I believe it has more to do with class differences.  All the
activists are people who have enough money & time to devote to volunteer
activities.  This includes unmarried people, married ones being supported by
their spouses, childless people or ones whose kids are on their one, gays, 
the affluent, & students.

Of course feminism is a larger movement that includes more people than those
who are staunch activists.  Not even a fanatic like myself is going to spend
all hi/r time as an activist.  Many feminists only respond when they are
called on to demonstrate.  Many more contribute money but no time, even for
the occasional demonstration.  Even more subscribe to feminist journals or
belong to feminist organizations but are never active in an organization.
And the largest group are those who have no organizational links but who
consider themselves feminists.  (Or maybe the largest group are the ones who
say "I'm no feminist, but ...."!)  To what extent those people are racist I
have no way of knowing.  I DO know that "feminist" does not equate to
"angelic" or even to "liberal."
				Larry Carroll
				"Takes-us" (correct pronunciation of Texas)
				Dancin' Fool

gcf@hombre.masa.COM (10/22/90)

morphy@truebalt.cco.caltech.EDU (Jones Maxime Murphy):
>A moderator on this group, Miriam Nadel rejected a post of mine with
>the comment that "race issues are only of marginal interest to
>soc.feminism". I have often heard black women complain that the
>feminist movement is insenstive to their concerns.
>
>Is feminism simply a tool for bringing about parity between men and
>women, while preserving racial inequality? In other words, is the
>program simply to level the discrimination against white women,
>leaving blacks behind? I'm particalarly interested in comments from
>black women on this issue.

I doubt if many feminists want to preserve racial discrimination.
However, the equal-rights branch of feminism is essentially
atomistic, seeing each type of social disparity as independent
and requiring a separate movement to combat.  Presumably, then, a
working-class black lesbian pacifist would have to belong to at
least five different organizations to satisfy her political needs.

Cultural or radical feminists, on the other hand, see racism as
"patriarchal," so those who were fighting racism would be able
to count on their support as an inherent part of their feminism --
if they could find any.  And if they wanted to.  Certain black
leaders have not been very supportive of feminism or of gay rights
(while others have).  There's a certain symmetry in the distribution
of the atomistic approach.
--
Gordon Fitch  |  uunet!hombre!mydog!gcf