hedrick@geneva.rutgers.edu (10/01/89)
When I wrote the review, I hadn't looked at the original NEB carefully for some time. I have now. In fact the REB is very close to the original NEB. Lots of details have been changed, but it is recognizably the same translation. They are sufficiently similar that it's hard to say there has been a major change in orientation. I don't want to change any of my commets about the REB, but don't take my claims of a change in policy between NEB and REB very seriously.