[soc.religion.christian] Christian music copyrights

us277492@mmm.serc.3m.com (Arthur T. Manning) (07/25/90)

More questions about copyright law...

I recently typed in the words to several christian songs to allow me
to print them out in a nice font for the purpose of making overhead
transparencies.

I would like to make these available to the christians on the net.

One problem...what constitutes breaking of the copyright laws, when the
files are transferred, or when someone makes hardcopies of them without
permission from the publishers?

What am I allowed to do with the songs I find in the songbooks I
legally purchased.

Now, besides what is 'legal', is it right for Christians to invoke the
secular legal system of copyrights to 'protect' their work (see I Cor 6)?
What is a person saying when they put this copyright notice on their
music for all to see?  Aren't they saying "If you reproduce this music of 
mine of which I have sold the ownership to this publisher, I support the
legal action which they can take against you under existing
copyright laws."?  This doesn't fit with 1 Corinthians 6.

I am interested in any Biblical basis of the copyright laws as they
exist.  Right now, I see them as a hinderance to the work of the music
ministry that I'm involved with.  What is wrong with copying the words
of the song onto transparency so people can join in singing without
asking and paying for 'permission' from the people that sold me the
songbook?  What rights did I purchase in the first place?

Ever heard of CCLI (Christian Copyright Licensing Incorporated)?
They offer a 'service' with which a local church can obtain annual
'permission' to use songs from a large variety of publishers.
Part of the application process is to go back through ALL the songs
in the music files and tabulate which songs have been put on 
transparency or any other form (song cards, slides, etc).

Toll free number:
   1-800-234-2446

 
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arthur T. Manning   atmanning@mmm.serc.3m.com                 /  
  3M Center 518-1                                       \____/_________  
  St Paul MN  55144-1000                              __ ,  /  _ __ __  \ 

[The copyright laws are broken when you make any copy of copyrighted
material without permission.  The violation would start with initially
keying them into your computer.

Intellectual property has a number of difficult implications.  But
what it comes down to is that people can't make a living doing
something unless you pay them.  If you take the position than all
Christian works should be public domain, you are saying that there
can't be professional composers of Christian works, or that you expect
them to live by donations.  This may be a position you want to take,
but you need to understand its implications.  Copyright is simply an
indication that the work is protected.  One could very well copyright
something but not ever sue to enforce the copyright.  This would be a
way to abide by I Cor 6.  The purpose of the copyright would be to
inform others that this work is by someone who makes his living by
writing, and they should not oopy it without payment.  Presumably
other Christians would believe that "a worker is worthy of his hire"
and abide by those wishes.  (However experience with music is that
this is not always true.  The other half of I Cor 6 is that people
should act in such a way that suits are not necessary.  Music
publishers have had to make a difficult choice between suing churches
and reducing the number of works they can carry.  Churches should not
put them in that position.)

By the way, if you are interested in doing something with a
copyrighted work, you should contact the copyright owner.  They
generally have procedures to allow you to put copies of works in
church bulletins, etc.  The charges would be minimal or zero.  The
same is true with the RSV and any other translation.  Copyright simply
says that the publisher asserts control over what happens.  What they
do with that control is up to them.  They may give permission for
non-commercial use without charge.  They may require a nominal fee.
Or they may have really unfriendly policies.

--clh]