[soc.religion.christian] Jesus' appearance/Schiller

ipoulin@uavax0.ccit.arizona.edu (06/10/91)

In article <Jun.5.23.52.40.1991.1337@athos.rutgers.edu>, schiller@src.sony.co.jp (Christoph SCHILLER) writes:
> [
> I recenly found a book in which it was stated that there is an
> old tradition that Jesus was born with a bad leg, had 
> curved shoulders and was in general of ugly appearance.
> 
> Does anybody have any information on this tradition ?
> More details, more references, etc?
> 
> What are the theological arguments for and against it?
> 
> Christoph Schiller   schiller@src.sony.co.jp

Christoph --

	 It sounds as if you remember that reading quite well, with one small
mistake though.  From the accounts that I have read, this sounds like the
supposed description of St. Paul.  As for sources on St. Paul's image, the only
source I can quote right now is the second century apocryphal book "The Acts
of Paul and Theccla":

	A MAN small of stature, with a bald head and crooked legs, in a
	good state of body, with eyebrows meeting and a nose somewhat
	hooked, full of friendliness; for now he appeared like a man, and
	now he had the face of an angel.


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

As to the visage of the Christ?  All I say there is that I care not, for
His love fealt in my heart is enough. :-)


					Ian Poulin
					ipoulin@cccit.arizona.edu

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Personal - I am a undergradute expecting to receive my degree
in Anthropology and Classics with emphasis on archaeology and
religeous science in about a year.  I follow the Roman Catholic
doctrinal sect of the Christian religeon and hope to further
my education with a degree in Near Eastern Archaeology for either
the Middle Bronze Age II period or the time of Paul, which would
need another degree in New Testement Theology (14 more years of school, joy!)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

gibbons@csn.org (Hugh Gibbons) (06/12/91)

In article <Jun.9.15.29.30.1991.25685@athos.rutgers.edu> ipoulin@uavax0.ccit.arizona.edu writes:
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>Personal - I am a undergradute expecting to receive my degree
>in Anthropology and Classics with emphasis on archaeology and
>religeous science in about a year.  I follow the Roman Catholic
>doctrinal sect of the Christian religeon and hope to further
>...
The Roman Catholic Church is not a sect: it is the mainstream
of Western Christianity.  The only comparable Christian
division of Christianity is the Orthodox Church, from which
it is little different.

The preceding was a paid advertisement.




-- 
--------------------
:-) Hugh Gibbons (-:
--------------------