[soc.religion.christian] Judgment part 4; Who Needs It!?

allenroy@cs.pdx.edu (callen roy) (06/15/91)

END TIME JUDGMENT:   WHO NEEDS IT?

Most of the negative comments one hears about the concept of an end-time 
judgment are reactions against what can only be viewed as a caricature of the
judgment.  This distorted, confused scenario of the judgment suggests some
very strange ideas about God and how He works, and as such it deserves to be
questioned by thoughtful people.  In its various forms, this view of the 
judgment goes something like this:

God simply cannot make up His mind about whom to save in the judgment.  So He 
must convene a court in order to reexamine the evidence before casting a
decision.  The Books of record, listing the good and bad works of each person,
are opened and examined.  As the lists of sins are reviewed, the Father's face
darkens, and the verdict looks doubtful for the individual in question.  But
then Jesus steps forward, and in the true adversary fashion typical of e
earthly courts, pleads the gracious merits of His blood over agains the stern
justice of the Father.  Perhpas if the believer has registered enough good
works on his record, Jesus can win his case.

This caricature continues by suggesting that, as each case is settled in the
courts of heaven and marked as 'accepted' or 'rejected', that person's
probation is closed.  The divine Magistrates then go on to the next cast--
apparently in chronological order.  When the entire list of repentant believers
has thus been examined, then judgment is over and the second coming is next on
on the agenda.  Thus, it is the heavy case load in the heavenly courts of the
long processing time which (according to this view) accounts for the delay
in the second coming of Jesus.  'What's the matter?' one young boy asked in 
all seriousness, 'Is God sort of secretarial help?'

Wouldn't we agree that such views of God and the final judgment deserve to be
challenged?  But what, then, is the more accurate view?  The Bible Does indeed
speak of a final judgment.  What is being decided?  Let's look at several
aspects of the heavenly court scene.

Who are the Key Personalities?

Daniel 7 names most of the key personalities involved in the judgment.(Daniel
7:9-13)  In the 'jury box' we see a fast array of holy angels, intensley
interested in the decisions about their future neighbors.  On the judge's bench
is, of course, the 'Father', described with all dignity befitting His office.
The Jesus, clothed in His humanity, is brought in to fill the role of defense
attorney.  We must not right at the start that in all decisions relating to the
redeemed, Jesus and His 'Father' are not adversaries.  To the contrary, they
stand totally united, on our side.(Romans 8:33,34; Micah 7:7-9)  In fact,
Jesus even went so far as to say that He would not pray to the 'Father' on
behalf of His disciples,(John 16:26,27) lest they misunderstand and think that
the 'Father' needed to be coaxed into granting their requests.  There is no
disunion in the Godhead--least of all on this matter!

Who, then, holds the position of prosecuting attorney-the adversary against God 
and His plan to redeem mankind?  Who else, but the adversary himself, (1 Peter
5:8) the accuser of the brethern, (Revelation 12:10) the one who has always 
stood by to challenge God's elect and to argue with God about His choice of
redeemed ones? (Zechariah 3:1-7)  Satan is the antagonist in the courtroom of
heaven.

Annoying as Satan's continual objections are (because of his prejudiced 
motives agains the Judge), God still treats Satan's charges with respect. It
has never been God's method to 'pull rank' on the enemy--to order him into
silence by His own usperior status.  Nor does God ever erase the evidence
against His people as a means of winning His case.  Because, as you recall,
the primary issue at stake is not the destiny of individual persons but the 
character and methods of the Judge Himself!  Satan cross-examines each of God's
decisions, not so much because he desires one more or less person to join him
in the lake of fire, but because he hopes to catch the Judge Himself in an
unfair act--an indefensible verdict.  This has always been his goal.

WHAT ARE THE ISSUES IN THE JUDGMENT?

Perhaps no part of Scripture better illustrates the issues in the judgment than
does the book of Job.  Surprising as it may seem, I think that this book's 
primary role in the Bible is not just to bring comfort during time so trial
(since Job really didn't get much of that), but rather to help us perceive the
cosmic issues in the judgment.  Since we are already familiar with the basic
narrative, let us note the following insights observed in the book:

First:  The setting for the book is a brisk disagreement between God and Satan
regqrding one man.  The evidence of Job's behavior is open to both and is not
weriously questioned.  Rather, the inner motives of the heart are disputed.

Second:  Satan is, in effect, charging that there is no such thing as genuine
faith; that if God is going to get followers, He has to do it by purchasing 
their loyalties.  No one, Satan calims, will serve God for God's sake alone,
but rather for the things they can get out of Him.  Genuine, God-centered 
faith, Satan insists, is a myth and can be exposed as such under pressure.

Third:  As such, the charge is really against God rather than against Job.
Satan is simply willing to USE Job to prove his point that God's methods of
winning loyalty won't work.  Satan intends that the outcome of the trial,
though initially reflecting badly on Job, will ultimately reflect badly on
God Himself.  it will expose God as having misplaced His confidence, as
having trusted methods that are really untrustworthy.  (It is in this sense
that the final judgment, thogh it centers on the cases of individuals, is
actually a judgment of God!  The cry of the first angel, 'The hour of HIS
judgment has come,'(Revelation 14:7) thus has a double meaning: though He is
dealing with individual cases, it is His own case on the line.  The 
ultimate result will be His exoneration, by the way in which He deals with
the individual cases!)

Fourth:  God is the One who nominated Job's name for judgment.(Job 1:8)  This
was His statement of confidence that He believed Job would stand firm under
the intense tiral by fire.  God put forward Job's name for corss-examination,
not because He wanted to make up His mind about Job, but because He had
ALREADY made up His mind about Job, and he believed that others would concur
that His confidence had been well placed.

This is a vital concept for understanding the final judgment.  The judgment
is not a time for God to DECIDE who are His.  The Lord already knows who are
His.(2 timothy 2:19)  Rather it is a time for Him to DEFEND the decisions He 
has already made.  It is a time when He can say both to Satan and to the 
onlooking univers, 'I believe in My people and in the reality of genuine faith.
I believe that they have been fully restored to unshakeable loyalty and can
be trusted with eternity without need to further alter their characters.  I am
confident that they will stand true even under the most severe test.(Zechariah
13:8,9)  And to emphasize His confidence, He will stand up and leave the 
sanctuary from which He has ministered forgivness for their specific sins.
(Daniel 12:1)  For He knows that they will not fall back into distrust and
rebellion again.

Fifth:  Job remained loyal to God and was in the end commended by God because
of one fact:  Job trusted God.  There was no evidence that Job ever understood
the reason for the clamities that were happening to him.  His four friends
urged him at length to accept an interpretation that would have portrayed God 
as working on the reward-for-goodness, punishment-for-badness philosophy.  He
rejected this interpretation, because he know God better than that!  And though
he had no surer interpretation to offer in return, he trusted God anyway.  Such
will be the experience of those whom God will put forward as evidencexD of His
restoring power in the final judgment.(Job 13:15; 25:6,7,10; Zephaniah 3:11-13)

WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE USED IN THE JUDGMENT?

The Bible speaks frequently of books of record in heaven which will be used in
the judgment.(Daniel 7:10; Exodus 32:32; Psalm 56:8; 69:28; 139:16; Malachi
3:16)  And it is certain that a person's actions, deeds, or works are part of 
that record and will be considered in judgment.(Romans 14:10; 2 Corinthians
5:10)  Some have found this a puzzling matter in view of two other questions:
Why does God need records--does He not have a perfect memory? And, What is the
point in keeping track of works--doesn7t the Bible say that we are saved apart
from our works?

The answer to the first question might be suggested in the words of the Lord to
Samuel as he was trying to evaluate which of Jesse's sons would make the best
King:  'The Lord sees not as man sees; man looks on the outward appearance, but
the Lord looks on the heart.(1 Samuel 16:7)  God remembers perfectly and 
evaluates the evidence accurately.  But remember, the judgment isn't really for
God's sake.  It is for the sake of all those letter beings in the universe who
cannot read the heart and who must therefore be convinced on the basis of
evidence that makes sense to them: The outward appearances of deeds and acts.

Regarding salvation apart from works; to be mor precise, the Bible says God
'saved us . . .not in virtue of our works.'(2 Timothy 1:9)  That is, man's 
works never have been and never will be the meritorious basis for salvation.
God's desired response from us is not that we work to earn His favor, but that
we respond in loving trust to favor already given.  Now, in God's mind, genuine
faith and the works which grow from faith are one and the same.  He can judge
one or the other and come up with the same answer.  But the apostle James 
voiced a familiar complaint--many people are simply fiving lip service to
faith.(James 2:14-24)  He urged the right to see real live works as an evidence
of faith--a request which God sees as still valid in the judgment.  So, for
everyone else's sake, He keeps track of works.  He has nothing to hide.  He has
no intent to nominate for jugment anyone whose faith cannot be vindicated by
his works.

Let me stress again, it is MAN'S OPINION of God, not GOD'S OPINION of man,
which needs to be changed before the end of the war of wars.  Thus the purpose
of the judgment is not for God to form an opinion of a man, but for us to see
God dealing so fairly, so lovingly in the settling of the final issues that we
will form an unchangingly loyal opinion of God!