[soc.religion.christian] Judgment part 6 Final Judgment in Symbol and Reality

allenroy@cs.pdx.edu (callen roy) (06/22/91)

THE FINAL JUDGMENT IN SHMBOL AND REALITY

The Jewish calendar of temple celebrations was a chronological symbol of the
history of the atonement.  Every twelve months it retold the full story of God's
work to eradicate sin from the universe.  The daily sacrifices were intended to
reveal to the sinner the great provision made for his own personal salvation.
Building on that same theme, the annual calendar took in the cosmic scope of
the atonement plan.

Each spring, Isreal gathered in Jerusalem to celebrate the Passover.  This 
feast looked back to their deliverance from Egypt and forward to the
sacrifice of the Messiah as their true Passover Lamb.  As such, it typified
the beginning of the Messiah (Christian) era.  This was reinforced by the
offering of the firstfruits several days later--a promise of the harvest which
the gospel would surely produce.

Fifty days later, the Feast of Pentecost marked the time of rejoicing for the
abundant harvest.  Its New Testament 'fulfillment' in the outpouring of the
Holy Spirit (Acts 2:1-4,14) illustrated its anticipation of the final
maturing of the harvest in the end of time.

But it is the fall celebrations, coming at the end of the liturgical calendar,
which are of most interest to us at this point in this study.  They began with
the solemn blowing of trumpets, stirring the thought of the people toward the
finality involved in these symbols.  The fall series of feasts ended with the
Feast of Tabernacles, a joyous festival recalling the first permanent
dwellings of God's people in canaan after many years of wanderings.  What
better symbol of the permanent heavenly homes to be enjoyed by the redeemed!
Pilgrims on earth, but not forever!

BETWEEN the blowing of the trumpets and the Feast of Tebernacles came a one-
day ceremony recognized as the most solemn of the year--the Day of Atonement.
The entire camp of Isreal prepared for this day with unusual searching of
heart.(Leviticus 16:32; 23:27-29)  They recognized it as dealing with sin in
some final way.  Notice these clues to its meaning:

Its position in the liturgical calendar--following the warning tones of the
trumpets, yet preceding the final rejoicing of being at home at last--
identifies it as a final act in dealing with sin.

The use of two goats, each dealt with in an entirely different way, pre-
figures a final showdown between the two great protagonists in the cosmic
controversy.  The Hebrew word for scapegoat, azazel, was commonly under-
stood to denote an evil one.

In marked contrast to the way virtually every other animal was dealth with
in the sanctuary, the scapegoat was not sacrificed.  Instead, it was 
carried away from civilization, never to return.(Leviticus 16:20-22)
Clearly, the people understood this to be a promise that the time would
come when sin would be more that forgiven; it would be removed forever
from the universe.

But remember:  God has always had but one way to remove sin--only one method
to eradicate sin from the universe.  He does not strong-arm Satan our of
reach, for POWERA is not the issue.  He does not command Satan in to silence
for AUTHORITY is not the issue.  Rather He exposes Satan for the fraud that
he is and fully reveals the more than adequate bsis for trust in Himself,
for TRUTH IS THE ISSUE!

The Day of Atonement is a promise that the time will come when Jesus--in His
role as High Priest--will step forth from the supreme court of heaven and,
in the presence of the entire universe, declare what the evidence has
overwhelmingly shown:  Satan is the father of all lies,  there is not one
tiny reason to distrust God, and the vote of the jury is unanimous.  Every
decision which God has made--about Satan, the redeemed, even the lost--has
been fair beyond question.  THIS IS HOW SIN IS REMOVED FROM THE UNIVERSE!

Throughout the year, as individual worshipers have brought their sin offer-
ings to the altar, the priest has carried a portion of the blood into the
sanctuary, sprinkling it before the veil.  This represents the fact that,
though he has accepted the Sacrifice to be made on the worthiper's behalf
and is thus forgiven, some aspect of the sin problem remains to be solved.
It doesn't mean that the 'Father' is uncertain about accepting the 'son's'
sacrifice as adequate to sequre forgiveness.  Rather, by accepting that 
blood into His most holy place, the 'Father' is saying that He will assume
accountability to see to it that Satan is ultimately shown to be the 
cause of that sin.

REPEATED BY DANIEL

This same final-judgment motif is repeated in the prophecies of Daniel 7
and 8, which is connected to Leviticus 16 by far more than just the word
cleasned (Daniel 8:14, KJV).  The similarities between the Daniel and
Leviticus accounts are striking:

First:  Both accounts describe the judgment as happening in the presence of
a vast assembled throng.  In the earthy type, the whole camp of Isreal was
intensely involved.(Leveiticus 23:28-31)  In Daniel's view of the heavenly
antitype, he beheld a virtually numberless thorng.(Daniel 7:10)  Thus the
pre-advent judgment is no private affair, taking place in the seclusion of
some forbidden chamber.

Second:  The setting portrays an ultimate showdown between the two heads
of great opposing forces.  The two goats of Leviticus--one honored in
sacrificial death, the other banished forever to a desolate place--clearly
typify Jesus versus Satan.  Daniel sees the little-horn power as a type of
Satan, most clearly identified by his accusing attack upon God Himself.
(Daniel 7:25)

Third:  The results of the two judgment accounts are also identical.  Just
as Satan and all he stands for is banished symbolically in Azazel,(Leviticus
16:20-22)  so Daniel forsees that all Satan's kingdom will be taken away
from him and awarded to Jesus and His Kingdom.(Daniel 7:22,26,27)

Fourth:  All of this happens, not at the time of Jesus' first coming,
but just prior to the setting up of His eternal kingdom.(Daniel 7:22,27;
Leviticus 23:26-33)  Thus it is an end-time judgment.(Daniel 8:17)

Daniel and Moses are each telling the same story, but from a different
perspective.  Daniel set the final judgment in the flow of secular history-
-the rise and fall of earthly nations and the setting up of an eternal
kingdom.  Moses, on the other hand, is speaking in the context of God's
covenant people, with a special emphasis on their involvement and on the
spiritual issues necessary to the settling of the war of wars.

I believe, from the prophecies of Daniel and Revelation, that we are living
through this end-time judgment now.  God has begun to bring the world into
final confrontation with truth so the war can be ended and Jesus can receive 
His kingdom.  This is not a time when Jesus and the 'Father' go into hiding
in order to make up their mindds about who to save!  Rather it is a time 
when the angelic forces are calling the world to 'Fear God, and give glory
to him; for the hour of his judgment is come.'(Revelation 14:7, KJV)--and
God has been waiting for a people who will carry that message to the 
world with such convincing power that the earth will be lightened with
it's glory.(Revelation 18:1-4)

We must be less concerned about the NEARNESS of Jesus' coming than we are
about the world knowing THE ONE WHO IS COMING!  For He can only have a
people who 'haved loved his appearing'(2 Timothy 4:8) when He has a people
who intelligently love, and properly represent, Him who shall appear.