dmg@retina.mitre.org (David Gursky) (08/24/89)
In deference/support to Y. Radai, while it is important to try and be consisten t about the naming convention we use for viruses and so forth, it is not "life- threatening". As the "Swap" virus does not fit into the current naming convention well, and "Swap" is not a "libelous" name (as opposed to calling it the "Jim and Tammy Bakker" virus for example), then why *shouldn't* we call it the "Swap" virus.