[net.auto] Iron fisted seat-belt enforcement

kis (08/20/82)

	SAFETY BEGINS WITH ONE'S OWN VEHICLE. I sympathize with GREG
	(!woods..) who would like to insist on seat-belt use for his
	passengers for insurance reasons. I don't buy excuses from ANY
	passenger for not wearing them in MY car. These are my arguments:

	1) I generally care about the people that ride with me, and wish them
	to have the best statistical odds of surviving an accident.

	2) The 'semi-compliment', that they believe that I'M a safe driver
	does not have any bearing on accidents that OTHERS may cause.

	3) Passengers who ride in the front seat, are liable to go through
	the windshield, a good excuse to wear a lap belt.  Hitting one's face
	on a steering wheel is great for the plastic surgeon and dentist
	business, a good reason to wear a shoulder restraint. People are
	overwhelmingly safer being restrained with seat belts, than 'jumping
	to safety'.

	4) People in the back seat become projectiles in an accident.  This
	is not too good for them, but it is worse for the people in front.
	(This is a purely selfish reason, since I'm usually in front).
	Medium sized back seat passengers are also prone to windshield
	encounters.

	I regret being forceful to polite company, but it only takes the
	witnessing of a few 'good' accidents to convince even the most
	foolish. Bodies are tortured in the most remarkable ways, events that
	could be lessened or avoided with seat belts. It seems almost
	inconcievable that people will still not wear their belts.

	I will spare you the tales of horror, of which there are more
	than I care to recall.

				Karen Schroeder
				Philips Laboratories
				(floyd!philabs!kis)
				     and
				Peekskill Volunteer Ambulance Corps.