[comp.virus] The dangers of self-extraction

p1@arkham.wimsey.bc.ca (Rob Slade) (05/09/91)

The perils of using self-extracting programs may be more potential
than real at the moment, but consider some of the following features:

LHARC (and now LHA) allow the inclusion of a batch file which allows
newly de-archived programs to be run automatically.  Of course, being
a batch file, it doesn't have to be limited to that.  What a wonderful
palce to put a trojan!  Of course, you can just have it run an
infected program, before anyone has a chance to use a nasty old virus
scanner on the programs ...

ARJ has a nifty new feature that allows the archiver to state that all
queries are to be answered "yes".  (At least, I think that is what it
means.  The documentation isn't entirely clear.)  This means that the
archivee doesn't have to worry about whether or not they want the
de-archiving to proceed, it just does.

"User-friendly" always seems to run counter to security.  In this
case, the features that make self-extraction appealing, are the very
ones that you have to somehow circumvent in order to be safe.

=============
Vancouver          p1@arkham.wimsey.bc.ca   | "If you do buy a
Institute for      Robert_Slade@mtsg.sfu.ca |  computer, don't
Research into      (SUZY) INtegrity         |  turn it on."
User               Canada V7K 2G6           | Richards' 2nd Law
Security                                    | of Data Security