ronald@ibmpcug.UUCP (Ronald Khoo) (06/16/89)
[6.5.4 - ok?]
respond to a message, do a ~H and the ignored headers get ignored
regardless of the state of 'alwaysignore' - the local flags
where NO_IGNORE is turned on in do_mail (line 61, mail.c)
doesn't propagate to copy_msg.
Has this already been discussed? I vaguely remember some discussion
about ignored headers a few weeks back - but i wasn't using ignored
headers then :-(
Comments?
--
Ronald Khoo @ The IBM PC User Group, PO Box 360, Harrow HA1 4LQ
Phone: +44 -1- 863 1191 Domain: ronald@ibmpcug.CO.UK
Path: ...!ukc!slxsys!ibmpcug!ronald Fax: +44 -1- 863 6095
My Opinions? Sell 'em if you can. See if I care!comp-mail-mush@srhqla.uucp (07/22/89)
From: "Barton E. Schaefer" <island!ucbcad!cse.ogc.edu!schaefer> On Jun 16, 11:46pm, Dan Heller wrote: } Subject: Re: Ignored headers } } > On Jun 16, 3:53pm, "Barton E. Schaefer" wrote: } } > The alwaysignore variable is really sort of broken anyway. ... } > ... The only case I can come up } > with where $alwaysignore has any effect is for the "Pipe" command, which } > becomes completely equivalent to "pipe" when $alwaysignore is set. } } As time went on, it came to be that the only place where alwaysignore } is really used is when you print mail via "lpr" and the "Pipe" command. I should probably point out that I typo'd bigtime there -- of course I meant "Print" and "print", not "Pipe" and "pipe". I'm surprised Dan didn't catch it. Just trying to avoid future confusion .... -- Bart Schaefer "And if you believe that, you'll believe anything." -- DangerMouse CSNET / Internet schaefer@cse.ogc.edu UUCP ...{sequent,tektronix,verdix}!ogccse!schaefer