nigel@CC.IC.AC.UK (Nigel Whitfield) (03/20/90)
In the next week or so, I shall be installing a system in my office running SCO Unix V/386, and I intend to install mush on the system as soon as humanly possible, before users have a chance to get to like anything else :-) I'd be very grateful if anyone out there who has done this can point out any problems or pitfalls that can be expected.... Nigel. -- It's true I've been lead an amazing dance poet@tardis.cs.ed.ac.uk But why should I ever complain? nigelw@ibmpcug.co.uk If I should be given a second chance n.whitfield@cc.ic.ac.uk I'd live it all over again.
ghost@robecdc.UUCP (William.A.Sneed) (03/21/90)
In article <9791.9003200949@sund.cc.ic.ac.uk> Nigel Whitfield <n.whitfield%CC.IC.AC.UK@mitvma.mit.edu> writes: >In the next week or so, I shall be installing a system in my office running >SCO Unix V/386, ... I'm Mush 7.0.4 with Deliver2.0, the only hiccup I had was an error on my part in installing Deliver2.0. I've been with Mush since 6.2. This is the MUA of choice. My understanding is that many of the folks at SCO are using Mush as their mailer of choice as well. It is robust and highly tolerant of other mailer systems. -- -William A. Sneed | All words are from me not my employer. All errors -...pyrdc!robecdc!ghost | are mine, all the glory is mine, all the flames are -(703) 631-4800 | mine, good, bad and ugly it's all mine. :-{> :-{> :-)