salzman%gaucho@RAND.ORG (Isaac Salzman) (11/21/89)
hi there. scavenge doesn't seem to work and i have no idea why. here's a transcript of the output of running scavenge, followed by a reconstruct. maybe one of the implementers can detect a problem? after running it, it scavenged one of the 28 new messages. a reconstruct picked everything up. here it is (notice the processing erros): gaucho:andrew 37 >cui CUI> set lev wiz Expertise level set to wizard CUI> scave info-andrew-pend Recursively scavenge all subdirectories [No] ? Purge deletions after scavenging [No] ? Checking for hidden messages in folder ~/.MESSAGES/info-andrew-pend. Found 28 old hidden messages in ~/.MESSAGES/info-andrew-pend (0 orphaned snapshots, 27 processing errors). Scavenged /i/salzman/.MESSAGES/info-andrew-pend. CUI> recons info-andrew-pend How do you want to sort the reconstructed folder 1 - By time stamp on the raw files 2 - By parsing the 'Date' header (slower; sets time stamps) Choose one [1 - By time stamp on the raw files]: 2 Reconstructing ~/.MESSAGES/info-andrew-pend; please wait... Reconstructed folder ~/.MESSAGES/info-andrew-pend with 228 entries CUI> EOF -Isaac (salzman@rand.org)
nsb@THUMPER.BELLCORE.COM (Nathaniel Borenstein) (11/21/89)
Sigh... not very informative, was it? "27 processing errors," indeed! It would help a lot, I suspect, if you would do the following, assuming the error is reproducible: In CUI, type "set debug 0 0 0 -1" and then give the scavenge command to reproduce the error. CUI will generate a TON of debugging output. (You might want to try it on a folder with only a few messages, in fact.) If you then send me and/or the ITC people that output, it might help to quickly pinpoint the problem. Thanks. -- NB