blake@walt.cc.utexas.edu (Blake Freeburg) (06/05/90)
Has anyone used or heard anything from Borland about the new Turbo Debugger, Turbo Profiler, and Turbo Assembler. Borland put up a notice that they were being released (2/6/90) but I have not received any upgrade notice. Also, Infoworld had a notice that TC++ will be released on May 14. Anybody know anything about that? BTW that is InfoWorld for April 23, 3rd page... Thanks in advance blake freeburg
dm3e+@andrew.cmu.edu (David Allen Markley) (06/05/90)
Just this week, a friend told me he had just received the Borland test version of TC++. It's ready to go out. I'll try to get more specifics, if I can. --David dm3e+@andrew.cmu.edu
shurr@cbnews.att.com (Larry A. Shurr) (06/05/90)
In article <29406@ut-emx.UUCP> blake@walt.cc.utexas.edu (Blake Freeburg) writes: >Has anyone used or heard anything from Borland about the new Turbo Debugger, >Turbo Profiler, and Turbo Assembler. Borland put up a notice that they >were being released (2/6/90) but I have not received any upgrade notice. >Also, Infoworld had a notice that TC++ will be released on May 14. Anybody >know anything about that? BTW that is InfoWorld for April 23, 3rd page... I received a notice from Borland last week regarding Turbo C++, Debugger, Profiler, Assembler. It was not an upgrade notice, but an offer to "all registered owners of a Borland product" to purchase Turbo C++ Professional (includes Assembler, Debugger, Profiler) for $125 + $5 shipping. I sent my order in last Wed and await my new Turbo C++ Professional. I don't have the glossies in front of me now, but they touted such features as a customizable integrated environment (multiple windows, use your favorite editor, etc...) and debugger understands and displays object hierarchies and has an "undo" feature allowing you to back out of an execution sequence. This last feature is a pretty neat trick; I don't recall that they mention any limitations on the "run backwards" feature, so I don't know how much backing out you can really do. regards, Larry -- Signed: Larry A. Shurr (cbnmva!las@att.ATT.COM or att!cbnmva!las) My psuedo-Burma Shave .signature has served me long and well and has been retired. A new .signature is now under consideration. This posting reflects my opinions, not those of AGS or AT&T, but you knew that)
RichThomas@cup.portal.com (Richard Rich Thomas) (06/06/90)
Turbo C++ is already shipping -- I've seen it in stores already. As for Turbo C++ Professional (includes Turbo Debugger 2.0, TASM 2.0, and Turbo Profiler), I've not seen that package, but believe it is shipping. Rich Thomas
David_Dave_Tamashiro@cup.portal.com (06/06/90)
I just got my upgrade to TC++ pro yesterday so I guess they are now shipping. I found it interesting that the box was label "not for export". I wonder what is in it that the State Dept. feels should not be exported. 386 code maybe?? Dave
mkallas@digi.lonestar.org (mark kallas) (06/06/90)
I received a notice this week that I can upgrade my Turbo Debugger & Assembler for $59.00 + $5.00 S&H. They are advertising their new debugger has reverse instruction tracing to see how you got there, a code profiler to analyze where your time is spent and full support for Turbo C++ and other Borland compilers. Their Assembler is fully MASM compatible and twice as fast. The package also has enhanced use of extended and expanded memory. A friend who bought the Turbo C Professional received an notice to upgrade to the new debugger and assembler and get C++ for $129.00 + ?? S&H. Mark Kallas
toma@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM (Tom Almy) (06/06/90)
Last week I called in an order for the upgrade to C++ Professional, and was told there would be a four week shipping time. I heard from another source that C++ Pro wouldn't appear in the stores until mid June. In the beginning of May I got an upgrade letter for the Assembler/Debugger! I thought it would be the C->C++ upgrade notice. I never got a C-C++ upgrade notice but I did receive an offer to get C++ based on my owning Turbo Pascal! (BTW, that costs $175 instead of the $125 for Turbo C owners). Tom Almy toma@tekgvs.labs.tek.com Standard Disclaimers Apply
jmoore@cidmac.ecn.purdue.edu (James D Moore) (06/08/90)
In article <1990Jun5.153558.14458@cbnews.att.com> shurr@cbnews.att.com (Larry A. Shurr) writes: >This last feature is a pretty neat trick; I don't recall that they mention >any limitations on the "run backwards" feature, so I don't know how much >backing out you can really do. > I recall reading that the "run backwards" feature allows you to backup in the current routine only. The way I understood it you could go into a subroutine and backtrack "n" statements but you could not back out of a subroutine. I beleive I read this in this months Byte magazine but don't quote me on it. >regards, Larry >-- >Signed: Larry A. Shurr (cbnmva!las@att.ATT.COM or att!cbnmva!las) >My psuedo-Burma Shave .signature has served me long and well and has been >retired. A new .signature is now under consideration. >This posting reflects my opinions, not those of AGS or AT&T, but you knew that) Jim Moore jmoore@cidmac.ecn.purdue.edu