rap@oliven.UUCP (Robert A. Pease) (12/01/84)
. Hey, if you don't want your Macro11 version of TECO you can always send it to me. I'd be glad to have it. -- Robert A. Pease {hplabs|zehntel|fortune|ios|tolerant|allegra|tymix}!oliveb!oliven!rap
david@ukma.UUCP (David Herron) (12/02/84)
If you find a C source for TECO, pass one on to me. The scurulous (sp?) rumors as to COMPAT not working under 4.2 is FALSE. We run 4.2 on a -750. We also have Macsyma. Our Macsyma is running under the compatibility mode. (I don't know if there is a 4.2 version of macsyma yet or not. We don't have it if there is). It runs fine. I have no idea what (if anything) it has done to our performance. ----------------------------------------- David Herron; ARPA: "ukma!david"@ANL-MCS (Note the quote marks.) UUCP: unmvax ---\ UUCP: research >-------/----------------- anlams --\ UUCP: boulder --/ / >-!ukma!david UUCP: decvax!ucbvax ---/ cbosgd!hasmed!qusavx --/
davidt@ttidca.UUCP (David Terlinden) (12/03/84)
Many others would also like TECO (or better DEC's TV) for UNIX. Any who have info. please reply in an article for all to see.
guy@rlgvax.UUCP (Guy Harris) (12/05/84)
> The scurulous (sp?) rumors as to COMPAT not working under 4.2 > is FALSE. We run 4.2 on a -750. We also have Macsyma. Our > Macsyma is running under the compatibility mode. (I don't know > if there is a 4.2 version of macsyma yet or not. We don't have it > if there is). By "compatibility mode" do you mean the 4.2BSD facility that permits it to execute 4.1BSD system calls (but from native VAX code), or the ability to run PDP-11 programs in the VAX-11 compatibility mode? The reference to "a 4.2 version of MACSYMA" and the fact that you're running MACSYMA at all leads me to think you mean the former (if somebody's stuffed a LISP big enough to run MACSYMA, much less MACSYMA itself, onto a PDP-11 I'd like to shake their hand). The people asking about TECO are asking about the latter, as PDP-11 TECO is written in MACRO-11. Guy Harris {seismo,ihnp4,allegra}!rlgvax!guy
mjl@ritcv.UUCP (Mike Lutz) (12/06/84)
This is in response to Guy Harris's note on what exactly was meant by "compatibility:" We're running with the 4.1 system call compatibility, and we also have some old PDP-11 programs running under the 'compat' program that came on a USENIX tape eons ago. For example, one of those old tapes had a DEC-style assembler and linking loader on it, and we run the executables of these programs under compat -- they're used to support our introductory computer organization/assembly language courses. -- Mike Lutz Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester NY UUCP: {allegra,seismo}!rochester!ritcv!mjl CSNET: mjl%rit@csnet-relay.ARPA